2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00392-020-01606-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimated plasma volume and mortality: analysis from NHANES 1999–2014

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Duarte ePVS provides a method that instantaneously estimate the plasma status [9]. In the largest study to date (data from the NHANS database, involving 42705 participants from 1999-2014), the mean ePVS in the general population was 4.2 ± 0.84 mL/g [10]. Another study recruited 1747 patients diagnosed with HF with preserved ejection fraction and found that the mean ePVS was 4.9 ± 1.0 mL/g [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Duarte ePVS provides a method that instantaneously estimate the plasma status [9]. In the largest study to date (data from the NHANS database, involving 42705 participants from 1999-2014), the mean ePVS in the general population was 4.2 ± 0.84 mL/g [10]. Another study recruited 1747 patients diagnosed with HF with preserved ejection fraction and found that the mean ePVS was 4.9 ± 1.0 mL/g [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies found that some indicators reflecting patients' demographic, hemodynamic, and metabolic profiles may predict the risk of postoperative hypotension, and hypotension can be subcategorized as cardiogenic or hypovolemic in most cases [7,8]. The estimated plasma volume status (ePVS) estimated by the Duarte formula which assesses the volume overload and reflects the prognosis at a very low cost, has proven to be associated with clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) [9][10][11]. Several reports assessed the correlation between ePVS and actual plasma volume measured using conventional radioisotope-labeled albumin or red blood cell assays and found that the ePVS derived from the formulas and actual plasma volume using the gold standard method showed a moderate-to-strong correlation [12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the PARADISE registry study, which enrolled 1369 patients admitted for acute dyspnoea in the emergency department, found that ePVS values greater than 5.12 mL/g presented an adjusted odds ratio of 1.47 (95% CI 1.04-2.09, P = 0.029) for in-hospital mortality [22]. Marawan et al [30] study showed that high ePVS was associated with an increased risk of all-cause death, with a hazard ratio of 1.29 (95% CI 1.24-1.25, P < 0.001), this results was similar to our findings. In our study, the higher-level of ePVS patients gained higher SAPSII (32.95 ± 0.56 vs. 26.00 ± 0.49, P < 0.001) and SOFA score (4.01 ± 0.10 vs. 2.13 ± 0.10, P < 0.001) compared with lower-level of ePVS ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasing DPVS is associated with higher risk of adverse outcome in patients with other conditions that are not associated with plasma volume expansion, such as cancer [31], or sepsis [32], suggesting that DPVS is not a surrogate measure of congestion, but a complicated way to apply measurements of haemoglobin.…”
Section: Dpvsmentioning
confidence: 99%