2001
DOI: 10.1515/crll.2001.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates for Kloosterman sums for totally real number fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a well-known problem in number theory to estimate these Fourier coefficients. Sum formulas for these Fourier coefficients which are quite similar to our formulas were obtained in [5][6][7]14]. Our formula is derived from the Kuznecov transform and inversion formula which were proved in [14] for the purpose of estimating these coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…It is a well-known problem in number theory to estimate these Fourier coefficients. Sum formulas for these Fourier coefficients which are quite similar to our formulas were obtained in [5][6][7]14]. Our formula is derived from the Kuznecov transform and inversion formula which were proved in [14] for the purpose of estimating these coefficients.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…A bit of terminology is needed before we can define the Kuznetsov trace formula. We closely follow [BMP1] . Consider the algebraic group G = R K/Q (SL 2 ) over Q obtained by restriction of scalars applied to SL 2 over K. We have…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here ν ∈ C, and µ is an element of a lattice in the hyperplane ℜ(x) = 0, x ∈ R 2 . In particular, µ is defined by a[γ] µ = 1 for γ ∈ Γ P , again using similar notation to [BMP1]. The series converges for ν > 1 2 , and has meromorphic continuation in ν with Laplaican eigenvalue 1 4 − (ν + µ 1 ) 2 , 1 4 − (ν + µ 2 ) 2 .…”
Section: Fourier Expansionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cependant, la formule est aussi valable pour k 2, comme dans le cas des formes modulaires classiques. On peut le prouver en adaptant un argument de passage à la limite dû à Rankin [21], section 5.7, ou en partant de la formule de Kuznetsov prouvée par [2], en choisissant la fonction test de sorte à isoler les formes de poids k.…”
Section: Annales De L'institut Fourierunclassified