2002
DOI: 10.3386/w9152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates from a Consumer Demand System: Implications for the Incidence of Environmental Taxes

Abstract: Most studies suggest that environmental taxes are regressive, and thus are unattractive policy options. We consider the distributional effects of a gasoline tax increase using three welfare measures and under three scenarios for gas tax revenue use. To incorporate behavioral responses we use Consumer Expenditure Survey data to estimate a consumer demand system that includes gasoline, other goods, and leisure. We find that the gas tax is regressive, but that returning the revenue through a lump-sum transfer mor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
70
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
70
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…West and Williams (2004) report that the presence of children increases the share of gasoline in a households budget, which is in apparent contradiction to our findings. There is however a difference between the explanatory variables in the two econometric specifications.…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…West and Williams (2004) report that the presence of children increases the share of gasoline in a households budget, which is in apparent contradiction to our findings. There is however a difference between the explanatory variables in the two econometric specifications.…”
contrasting
confidence: 57%
“…al. 1995, Puller and Greening 1999, Schmalensee and Stoker 1999, Kayser 2000, West and Williams 2004. We also use the number of automobiles, vans or SUV's as an explanatory variable but specify the presence of other types of vehicles through a dummy variable.…”
Section: The Econometric Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This view is, however, contested as the efficiency of the consumption taxes enables public authorities to implement compensation and redistribution schemes (Bankman and Weisbach 2005;Decoster et al 2010;Corbacho et al 2013). Those schemes are in particular needed in the case of the development of environmental consumption taxes (Ekins and Dresner 2004;West and Williams 2004;Büchs et al 2011;Kosonen 2012;Dissou and Siddiqui 2014;Beck et al 2015;Yusuf and Resosudarmo 2015). In the DaVAT framework, the important thing to keep in mind is that the increase in most polluting products' prices is associated with a decrease in the price of the (most numerous) low-polluting products previously subject to VAT, which has redistributive properties.…”
Section: Acceptability Of the Proposalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…West (2004) and West and Williams (2004) pointed out that lower-income households have more elastic gasoline demand than higherincome households, and that this lowers the burden they bear from a price increase, making the gas tax less regressive than if the elasticity were constant across incomes.…”
Section: B Distributional Implications Of Motor Fuel Taxesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…West and Williams (2004) find that the burden of a gas tax is highest for the secondlowest income quintile and lowest for the top quintile, though it is relatively flat across the bottom four quintiles: they estimate that raising the gas tax to the efficient rate (an increase of roughly $1/gallon) would impose a burden of 2.78% of annual expenditures for the bottom quintile, and 3.01% 2.88%, 2.49% and 1.60% for the second through fifth quintiles, respectively.…”
Section: B Distributional Implications Of Motor Fuel Taxesmentioning
confidence: 99%