2023
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7221a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of Bivalent mRNA Vaccine Durability in Preventing COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization and Critical Illness Among Adults with and Without Immunocompromising Conditions — VISION Network, September 2022–April 2023

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have assessed the real-world effectiveness of the Pfizer BA.4-5 bivalent booster vaccine and found broadly similar results to us; one study from the United States found the incremental effectiveness against hospitalisation of a BA.4-5 bivalent booster was 42% when the last dose was monovalent and given 5 to 7 months prior (23), while another found the relative effectiveness against hospitalisation was 52% when the last dose was monovalent (27). Meanwhile a recent Italian study found the relative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 boosters was 50.6% against severe disease when the last dose was given at least 120 days prior (28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Other studies have assessed the real-world effectiveness of the Pfizer BA.4-5 bivalent booster vaccine and found broadly similar results to us; one study from the United States found the incremental effectiveness against hospitalisation of a BA.4-5 bivalent booster was 42% when the last dose was monovalent and given 5 to 7 months prior (23), while another found the relative effectiveness against hospitalisation was 52% when the last dose was monovalent (27). Meanwhile a recent Italian study found the relative effectiveness of bivalent BA.4-5 boosters was 50.6% against severe disease when the last dose was given at least 120 days prior (28).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Also, we did not observe differences between the groups on HRQoL, differently from what observed for monovalent BNT162b2. Protection from COVID-19 bivalent vaccination has been observed to vary by Omicron sub-lineage, prior infection status, time since vaccination, time since prior infection, severity of infection and presence of risk factors [28,29]. Bivalent vaccination was targeted against BA.4/BA.5 Omicron sub-lineages and, while real-world evidence studies suggested cross-protection against successive sub-lineages, XBB was reported to be highly immune-evasive, triggering the need for a new, more closely matched, XBB vaccine formulation for 2023 / 2024 campaigns [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, protection against symptomatic infection is limited, and waning of immunity is a reality with the currently available vaccines. Among adults who are otherwise healthy (“immunocompetent”), recent estimates of vaccine effectiveness of a bivalent vaccine against hospitalization for COVID-19 were 62% compared with no vaccination in the 2 months after the bivalent dose but decreasing to 24% 4 to 6 months after the bivalent dose . The CDC considers an individual who has completed a primary series and received a single booster as “up to date” in their COVID-19 vaccination.…”
Section: What Is the Current Role Of Vaccination?mentioning
confidence: 99%