1997
DOI: 10.1007/s002710050032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of deep percolation beneath cotton in the Macquarie Valley

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hydrologic budgets of irrigated river valleys reveal that a large percentage of total water diverted for irrigation seeps from canals and percolates below the plant rooting zone. For example, studies indicate that typical canal losses range from 16% to 43% of channel flow [13][14][15], and percolation rates below crop rooting zones as a percentage of irrigation water applied range from less than 23% to 60% or more [16][17][18][19]. Unlike evapotranspiration losses that take water out of the system and preclude future use, canal seepage and field percolation perform the important function of recharging groundwater as demonstrated with hydrodynamic, chemical, stable isotope, and simulation modeling approaches [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Hydrologic Connections Between Acequia Irrigation Systems Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hydrologic budgets of irrigated river valleys reveal that a large percentage of total water diverted for irrigation seeps from canals and percolates below the plant rooting zone. For example, studies indicate that typical canal losses range from 16% to 43% of channel flow [13][14][15], and percolation rates below crop rooting zones as a percentage of irrigation water applied range from less than 23% to 60% or more [16][17][18][19]. Unlike evapotranspiration losses that take water out of the system and preclude future use, canal seepage and field percolation perform the important function of recharging groundwater as demonstrated with hydrodynamic, chemical, stable isotope, and simulation modeling approaches [19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Hydrologic Connections Between Acequia Irrigation Systems Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although this method is not the most efficient means of water delivery, it helps prevent soil salinization in the crop root zone since addition of sufficient water induces deep percolation. Deep percolation rate can be estimated directly by the Darcian flux calculation method if estimates of in situ soil water potential profiles are available, e.g., by water balance or chloride mass balance modeling [38] . Empirical formulas relating to root zone water storage and to field capacity can also be used [39] .…”
Section: Percolation/phreatic Evaporation-water Exchange Between Satumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the determination of soil water flow by K(θ) was unsatisfactory in some studies (Willis et al, 1997;Selle et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%