Three experiments assessed the hypothesis that cognitive benefits associated with exposure to music only occur when the perceived emotion expression of the music and the participant's affective state match. Experiment 1 revealed an affect-matching pattern modulated by gender when assessing high-arousal states of opposite valence (happy/angry) in an adult sample (n=94) in which mood classification was based on self-report, and affective valence in music was differentiated by mode and other expressive cues whilst keeping tempo constant (139 BPM). The affect-matching hypothesis was then tested in two experiments with children using a moodinduction procedure: Experiment 2 tested happy/angry emotions with, respectively, 3-5-(n=40) and 6-9-year-old (n=40) children, and Experiment 3 compared happy/sad emotions (i.e., states differing both for valence and arousal profiles) with 3-5-year-old children (n=40), using music pieces differentiated also by fast vs. slow tempo. While young children failed to discriminate systematically between fast tempo music conveying different emotions, they did display cognitive benefits from exposure to affect-matching music when both valence (e.g., mode) and arousal level (e.g., tempo) differentiated the musical excerpts, with no gender effects.
Keywords:Arousal, Central executive, Child development, Mozart Effect
3In music psychology, the beneficial effects of music on psychosocial functioning, and the role played by emotion and mood in producing those effects, are currently important topics of research (MacDonald, Kreutz, & Mitchell, 2012). One area of experimental research that has received particular attention is the study of the 'Mozart effect', a term that refers to findings of temporary improvements in cognitive performance after listening to music (for a review, see Schellenberg, 2012). Doubts about the theoretical underpinnings of the original study that spawned research on the 'Mozart effect' (Rauscher, Shaw, & Ky, 1993) led Schellenberg and collaborators to formulate an alternative theory called the 'arousal and mood hypothesis', which proposed that temporary improvements in cognitive performance were not a direct product of listening to music, but were rather a product of arousal and positive affect induced by listening to music. According to this hypothesis, the 'Mozart effect' is neither Mozart-specific nor music-specific: any piece of music, or any nonmusical stimulus, that induces arousal and positive affect can be used to produce temporary improvements in cognitive performance. This proposal is consistent with a wide range of studies finding that positive affect enhances performance on cognitive tasks (e.g. see Isen, 2008). A series of studies conducted by Schellenberg and collaborators supported the arousal and mood hypothesis (Husain, Thompson, & Schellenberg, 2002;Schellenberg, Nakata, Hunter, & Tamoto, 2007;Thompson, Schellenberg, & Husain, 2001; for a review, see Schellenberg, 2012).A key assumption made by Schellenberg and others is that happy-sounding music ...