2015
DOI: 10.5958/2277-3371.2015.00007.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of Genetic Parameters and Trends of Lactation Performance Traits of Deoni Cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There was significant negative correlation between peak yield and Prasad method of estimation and also significant negative correlation between Solkner and Fuchs 305 day's method with lactation length (Table 4). In Tharparkar cattle, highly significant positive correlation of lactation persistency with total milk yield (TMY) was found, similar results were reported by Saxena and Kumar (1960), Shewta (2018) and Sharma and Bhatnagar (1972) in Sahiwal cattle as 0.79, 0.5 and 0.56 ± 0.4 respectively and Gill et al (1971) in Hariana cattle (0.36 ± 0.02) and Shingare et al (2015) found in Deoni cattle (0.60 ± 0.47). In Tharparkar cattle negative correlation of peak yield with lactation persistency was found for Prasad method and similar results were reported by Gill et al (1971) and Singh et al (1965) in Hariana cattle (-0.007 and -0.16 respectively).…”
Section: Correlation Of Persistency Indices With Production Traitssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There was significant negative correlation between peak yield and Prasad method of estimation and also significant negative correlation between Solkner and Fuchs 305 day's method with lactation length (Table 4). In Tharparkar cattle, highly significant positive correlation of lactation persistency with total milk yield (TMY) was found, similar results were reported by Saxena and Kumar (1960), Shewta (2018) and Sharma and Bhatnagar (1972) in Sahiwal cattle as 0.79, 0.5 and 0.56 ± 0.4 respectively and Gill et al (1971) in Hariana cattle (0.36 ± 0.02) and Shingare et al (2015) found in Deoni cattle (0.60 ± 0.47). In Tharparkar cattle negative correlation of peak yield with lactation persistency was found for Prasad method and similar results were reported by Gill et al (1971) and Singh et al (1965) in Hariana cattle (-0.007 and -0.16 respectively).…”
Section: Correlation Of Persistency Indices With Production Traitssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…So based on the breed and their adaptability to different environmental conditions will change therefore they show variation in lactation persistency also. Some workers reported the non-significant effect of season of calving in PhuleTriveni cattle by Garudkar (2018); Jersey breed by Patond et al (2014); Gir by Shingare et al (2015) and Jersey x Hariana by Koley et al (1979). Williams et al (2021) reported that, the lactation length of cow calving in February, March, or April was, on average, 4.2, 12.7, and 21.9 days respectively shorter, relative to cows calving in January.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was highest during summer season (1910.10±74.27 kg), and minimum during winter season (1870.41 ± 71.28 kg). However, effect of season of calving on 305 DMY of primiparous cow was non significant (Table1) and it is in close agreement withEkka (2014);Shingare et al (2015) andGaikwad et al (2018) for Kankrej cattle, Deoni cattle and Phule Triveni cattle, respectively. Whereas, it is in contrast with the findings ofKakati et al (2017).…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…Service period as a co-variable significantly (P<0.01) affected calving interval in Sahiwal cattle. Shinghare et al (2015) reported non-significant influence of period and season of calving on calving interval however, Manoj et al (2010) reported significant effect of period on calving interval in Sahiwal cattle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%