2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.04.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of genetic parameters for milkability from automatic milking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

11
33
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
11
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Lactation heritabilities of 0.46, 0.44 and 0.41 for lactations 1, 2 and 3, respectively, were derived when 10 equally spaced test-days per lactation were assumed. These heritabilities agreed with estimates from other studies, where models with repeated observations per cow were applied (Gä de et al, 2006;Norberg and Rasmussen, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lactation heritabilities of 0.46, 0.44 and 0.41 for lactations 1, 2 and 3, respectively, were derived when 10 equally spaced test-days per lactation were assumed. These heritabilities agreed with estimates from other studies, where models with repeated observations per cow were applied (Gä de et al, 2006;Norberg and Rasmussen, 2007).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In our study, data were from a larger time span (9 years v. 3 years) and, therefore, besides using a different model, a better structure of the data might explain the higher estimates. The heritability of automatically recorded milk flow rate reported by Gä de et al (2006) and Norberg and Rasmussen (2007) was, respectively, 0.55 and 0.39. In Ilahi and Kadarmideen (2004), the heritability of measured AFR for Brown Swiss and Simmental was 0.46 and 0.48, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Selection for good milkability thus seems to have promise. In a previous study (Gä de et al, 2006), the heritabilities estimated based on daily values for serial milkability from an automatic milking system were h 2 5 0.55 for average milk flow, h 2 5 0.55 for maximum milk flow and h 2 5 0.39 for milking time, thus being similar to the respective estimates from the present study. In contrast, estimates for serially recorded milking speed from Karacaö ren et al (2006) using daily test-day random regression methodology were considerably lower varying from h 2 5 0.003 to h 2 5 0.098 for day 1 to day 305 of lactation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The fixed effects included in the models 1 and 2 were chosen in reference to a previous study (Gä de et al, 2006) and because they were significant in the analysis of variance. For the SCS, model 2 was applied with 165 herd test-days (j 5 1 to 165), 10 009 additive genetic effect levels and 5909 permanent environmental effect levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation