1988
DOI: 10.2527/jas1988.66102498x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of Genetic Parameters for Carcass Measures of Body Composition and Growth in Swine

Abstract: Records for pigs included in an experiment on reciprocal recurrent selection conducted from 1956 through 1971 at the USDA Beltsville Agriculture Research Center were analyzed to obtain estimates of heritabilities and genetic correlations and to derive prediction equations for estimating weight of lean cuts (WTLC) and percentage of lean cuts of shrunk slaughter weight (LCPC). Lean cuts growth rate (LCGR) was then estimated as WTLC/age of pig at slaughter. The base population consisted of two unrelated crossbred… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Growth rate was estimated to have a low to moderate unfavorable genetic correlation with scanned backfat thickness (Table 4) and a moderate unfavorable genetic correlation with carcass backfat thickness ( Table 5). Several studies (McPhee et al, 1979;Cleveland et al, 1982;Bereskin and Steele, 1988) have demonstrated an undesirable genetic relationship between growth rate and backfat thickness. The high genetic correlations between real-time ultrasonic measures of backfat and longissimus muscle area at the last rib and carcass measurement made a t the loth rib (Table 51, plus the moderate to high &AGE = days to 103.6 kg BW; ADG = average daily gain from 39.6 to 103.6 kg BW, grams; USBF = real-time ultrasonic backfat thickness at the last rib at 103.6 kg BW, millimeters; USLMA = real-time ultrasonic longissimus area at the last rib at 103.6 kg BW, square centimeters; LMA = longissimus muscle area at the 10th rib, square centimeters; BFTR = backfat at the 10th rib, millimeters; IMF = intramuscular fat, percentage of extractable lipid from the longissimus muscle; -.oo &AVBF = average of first rib, last rib, and last lumbar vertebra backfat measurements, millimeters; BFTR = backfat at the 10th rib, millimeters; LMA = longissimus muscle area at the 10th rib, square centimeters; IMF = intramuscular fat, percentage of extractable lipid from the longissimus muscle; PWAT = percentage of H20 in ground and mixed samples of longissimus muscle; FWAT = percentage of free water content of the muscle (high values indicate poor waterholding capacity); and SH = shear force, kilograms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Growth rate was estimated to have a low to moderate unfavorable genetic correlation with scanned backfat thickness (Table 4) and a moderate unfavorable genetic correlation with carcass backfat thickness ( Table 5). Several studies (McPhee et al, 1979;Cleveland et al, 1982;Bereskin and Steele, 1988) have demonstrated an undesirable genetic relationship between growth rate and backfat thickness. The high genetic correlations between real-time ultrasonic measures of backfat and longissimus muscle area at the last rib and carcass measurement made a t the loth rib (Table 51, plus the moderate to high &AGE = days to 103.6 kg BW; ADG = average daily gain from 39.6 to 103.6 kg BW, grams; USBF = real-time ultrasonic backfat thickness at the last rib at 103.6 kg BW, millimeters; USLMA = real-time ultrasonic longissimus area at the last rib at 103.6 kg BW, square centimeters; LMA = longissimus muscle area at the 10th rib, square centimeters; BFTR = backfat at the 10th rib, millimeters; IMF = intramuscular fat, percentage of extractable lipid from the longissimus muscle; -.oo &AVBF = average of first rib, last rib, and last lumbar vertebra backfat measurements, millimeters; BFTR = backfat at the 10th rib, millimeters; LMA = longissimus muscle area at the 10th rib, square centimeters; IMF = intramuscular fat, percentage of extractable lipid from the longissimus muscle; PWAT = percentage of H20 in ground and mixed samples of longissimus muscle; FWAT = percentage of free water content of the muscle (high values indicate poor waterholding capacity); and SH = shear force, kilograms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bereskin & Steele (1988) reported heritability estimates of 0.71 for swine carcass length and 0.31 for longissimus muscle area. Overall, only weak epistasis signals were detected in a few traits, suggesting that epistasis might not be very important in determining these kinds of traits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vertebral number in pigs is generally associated with body size, which may affect meat productivity and reproductive performance. The length of the loin muscle is negatively correlated with the loin eye muscle area (EMA) and backfat thickness (BF) (Bereskin & Steele ; Stewart & Schinckel ; Hicks et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%