2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11255-017-1664-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of health utility scores in chronic kidney disease

Abstract: Health utility scores were low relative to the general population norm in our study cohort. Longitudinal assessment of CKD patients to capture possible fluctuations in health utility scores may add useful information.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to a systematic review conducted by Liem et al, 2 the e cacy values for dialysis had 95% con dence intervals (CIs) of 0.54-0.68, 0.57-0.92, and 0.49-0.62 in the Time Trade-off, Standard Gamble, and EuroQoL ve-dimensional (EQ-5D) scores, respectively. Besides these measures, the Health Utilities Index 3 and six-dimensional health state short form [4][5][6] were used. However, the impact of dialysis duration on QOL has not been completely elucidated, as Phair et al 7 reported a decrease from 0.73 at baseline to 0.67 at 1-year follow-up, while Yang et al 8,9 reported that dialysis lasting more than 3.5 years had no impact on QOL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a systematic review conducted by Liem et al, 2 the e cacy values for dialysis had 95% con dence intervals (CIs) of 0.54-0.68, 0.57-0.92, and 0.49-0.62 in the Time Trade-off, Standard Gamble, and EuroQoL ve-dimensional (EQ-5D) scores, respectively. Besides these measures, the Health Utilities Index 3 and six-dimensional health state short form [4][5][6] were used. However, the impact of dialysis duration on QOL has not been completely elucidated, as Phair et al 7 reported a decrease from 0.73 at baseline to 0.67 at 1-year follow-up, while Yang et al 8,9 reported that dialysis lasting more than 3.5 years had no impact on QOL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to a systematic review conducted by Liem et al [2], the efficacy values for dialysis had 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 0.54-0.68, 0.57-0.92, and 0.49-0.62 in the Time Trade-off, Standard Gamble, and EuroQoL five-dimensional (EQ-5D) scores, respectively. Besides these measures, the Health Utilities Index [3] and six-dimensional health state short form [4][5][6] were used. However, the impact of dialysis duration on QOL has not been completely elucidated, as Phair et al [7] reported a decrease from 0.73 at baseline to 0.67 at 1-year follow-up, while Yang et al [8,9] reported that dialysis lasting more than 3.5 years had no impact on QOL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%