2002
DOI: 10.3133/wri20024092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of recharge to unconfined aquifers and leakage to confined aquifers in the seven-county metropolitan area of Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota

Abstract: Recharge to unconfined aquifers in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area of Minnesota was estimated by five methods. Mean recharge estimated as a percentage (27 percent) of precipitation ranged from 7.7 to 8.3 in./yr across the study area. The median recharge estimated from automated analyses of streamflow-recession displacements for seven basins ranged from 1.2 to 12.2 in./yr. Median recharge estimated from graphical analyses of groundwater level fluctuations for 11 wells ranged from 4.5 to 13.6 in./… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Leakage area delineation in multi-aquifer systems is one of the most challenging topics of regional hydrogeological studies. Existing methods for this purpose include the use of natural environmental tracers, mostly isotopes and chloride (Anker, 2003 Kleinig et al, 2015); and balance calculations (Walton, 1960;Ruhl et al, 2002;Anker, 2007;Messerschmid et al, 2018; Kunchao Lei et al, 2020). The best review of methods for aquifer connectivity determination is given in the report of CIESC (Harrington et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Leakage area delineation in multi-aquifer systems is one of the most challenging topics of regional hydrogeological studies. Existing methods for this purpose include the use of natural environmental tracers, mostly isotopes and chloride (Anker, 2003 Kleinig et al, 2015); and balance calculations (Walton, 1960;Ruhl et al, 2002;Anker, 2007;Messerschmid et al, 2018; Kunchao Lei et al, 2020). The best review of methods for aquifer connectivity determination is given in the report of CIESC (Harrington et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%