2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10344-011-0536-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of regional population densities of badger Meles meles, fox Vulpes vulpes and hare Lepus europaeus using walked distance sampling

Abstract: Walked spotlight transect surveys with distance sampling were used to estimate regional population densities of badger (Meles meles), fox (Vulpes vulpes) and brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in south-west England (Cornwall, Devon, Gloucestershire, Herefordshire) and Wales (Pembrokeshire, Borders, North Wales). All regions were surveyed during spring 2006 with English regions re-surveyed in autumn 2006. In each region, surveys were conducted in a random sample of 19.6 km 2 areas (mean areas per region: spring=19, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The highest density was calculated at the most species rich site, the national park site of Junik, where hunting is permanently prohibited; while the lowest density was found at the least species rich site, Malisheva, which had one of the highest levels of public access and consisted of smaller, more fragmented areas of forest. The range of density estimates obtained from the camera survey for foxes in Kosovo forests are comparable to densities reported in other European countries, with rural fox densities ranging from 0.2 to 0.4/km 2 in Northern Scandinavia [24] up to 4/km 2 in South West England [25]. The total Kosovo fox population is likely to be much higher than the above estimate, as generally forest areas will support lower fox densities than more heterogeneous environments such as agricultural land [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The highest density was calculated at the most species rich site, the national park site of Junik, where hunting is permanently prohibited; while the lowest density was found at the least species rich site, Malisheva, which had one of the highest levels of public access and consisted of smaller, more fragmented areas of forest. The range of density estimates obtained from the camera survey for foxes in Kosovo forests are comparable to densities reported in other European countries, with rural fox densities ranging from 0.2 to 0.4/km 2 in Northern Scandinavia [24] up to 4/km 2 in South West England [25]. The total Kosovo fox population is likely to be much higher than the above estimate, as generally forest areas will support lower fox densities than more heterogeneous environments such as agricultural land [26].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Frequent building visits recorded in England might reflect a preponderance of studies in Gloucestershire, where badger density is high (Neal & Cheeseman 1996); indeed one study explicitly selected farms based on high badger density (Tolhurst et al 2009). Since the densities in our four study areas (4.2-6.3 badgers/km 2 by the minimum number alive method; Table S8) are fairly typical of TB-affected farmland in Britain (Bourne et al 2007, Parrott et al 2012, the relatively low rates of building use that we detected might also be representative.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Unpublished data collected by Cheshire Wildlife Trust during its TB badger vaccination campaign in 2013 and 2014 found estimated densities of up to 10.5 badgers per km 2 . These estimates may be inflated by their being based on surveys of areas with known badger populations, but suggest densities in some areas of Cheshire not dissimilar to those found in the South-West areas of England in 2010, where densities ranged from 1.5–4.8 per km 2 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%