2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2197535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimates of the Size and Source of Price Declines Due to Nearby Foreclosures

Abstract: Using a novel dataset which merges real estate listings with real estate transactions in San Francisco from 2007-2009, we present new evidence that foreclosures causally depress nearby home prices. We show that this decrease occurs only after the foreclosed home is listed for sale, which suggests that the effect is due to the additional housing supply created by foreclosure rather than from neglect of the foreclosed property. Consistent with a framework where a foreclosed home simply increases supply, we find … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
79
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
7
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimates imply that a 10% increase in the number of homes on the market is associated with a four‐percentage‐point decline in house prices. This evidence is consistent with Hartley () and Anenberg and Kung (), who find that the supply effect dominates the dis‐amenity effect in most areas.…”
Section: The Effect Of Foreclosures On House Prices and Housing Invensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Estimates imply that a 10% increase in the number of homes on the market is associated with a four‐percentage‐point decline in house prices. This evidence is consistent with Hartley () and Anenberg and Kung (), who find that the supply effect dominates the dis‐amenity effect in most areas.…”
Section: The Effect Of Foreclosures On House Prices and Housing Invensupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The estimates point to a sizable decrease in the sale price of transacted properties of around 1% to 4% after the sale. These estimates are comparable to those in prior research, such as Anenberg and Kung () or Campbell, Giglio, and Pathak (), who estimate a roughly 1% effect on price after differencing out price impacts on more distant geographies. Panel B estimates the effect of foreclosures on the repeat‐sale measure of prices, in which the dependent variable is now logfalse(Pi,tqifalse)/logfalse(Pitfalse), where Pi,tqi is the last transacted sale on the property.…”
Section: Mechanismssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…My paper relates most strongly to existing studies on the local effects of foreclosures. Many of these papers examine the price impacts of foreclosures, including Harding, Rosenblatt, and Yao (), Campbell, Giglio, and Pathak (), Anenberg and Kung (), and Gerardi et al. ().…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other study that attempts to separate the supply and disamenity effect of foreclosures is Anenberg and Kung (2014). Anenberg and Kung (2014) look at the effect of foreclosures in multiple listing service (MLS) data on nearby asking prices for homes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anenberg and Kung (2014) look at the effect of foreclosures in multiple listing service (MLS) data on nearby asking prices for homes. They find that each additional foreclosure listed is associated with a 1.5% drop in sales price for homes within 0.1 miles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%