2009
DOI: 10.1378/chest.07-0275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating a Minimally Important Difference in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Following Treatment With Sildenafil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
56
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Hoekstra and colleagues report that a 10-unit decrease in physical function subscale (the minimal important difference [MID] for this parameter in LHF) was associated with an 8% increase risk of death at 3 years in LHF (HR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14 in multivariable models) (48). In our cohort, a clinically relevant change in physical functioning subscale, reported as 13 units by Gilbert and colleagues in a cohort of patients with PAH, would be associated with a 24% increased risk of death (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.49) (52).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…For instance, Hoekstra and colleagues report that a 10-unit decrease in physical function subscale (the minimal important difference [MID] for this parameter in LHF) was associated with an 8% increase risk of death at 3 years in LHF (HR, 1.08; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.14 in multivariable models) (48). In our cohort, a clinically relevant change in physical functioning subscale, reported as 13 units by Gilbert and colleagues in a cohort of patients with PAH, would be associated with a 24% increased risk of death (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.03-1.49) (52).…”
Section: Original Researchmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…79 However, as previously noted, in SSc-PAH, 6MWD as a surrogate marker for RV function may be confounded by the high prevalence of myopathy, arthropathy, and ILD. [80][81][82][83] Pro-BNP also offers some value as a longitudinal management tool.…”
Section: Role Of Sponsorsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The learning effect may be attenuated over subsequent repeats of the test [7]. WISE [192] PUHAN [193] PUHAN [194] POLKEY [195] GILBERT [197] MATHAI [198] HOLLAND [85] SWIGRIS [196] DU BOIS [62] However, there is a suggestion that over longer periods (.8 weeks) the learning effect may reset to a level similar to that recorded at first test exposure [208]. This observation requires further corroboration.…”
Section: Learning Effect On Iswtmentioning
confidence: 99%