2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2019.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating above ground biomass as an indicator of carbon storage in vegetated wetlands of the grassland biome of South Africa

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The estimation accuracy of the multispectral satellite-based biomass retrieval ranged from 67% to 85%. In grasslands, vegetation indices offer the advantage of superseding the influences of soil background, atmospheric composition, and the viewing and zenith angle effects, while enhancing the vegetation signal, when estimating AGB [41]. The regression model with an input variable of VH using Sentinel-1 SAR data only does not perform very well.…”
Section: The Accuracy and Uncertainty Of The Agb Estimation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation accuracy of the multispectral satellite-based biomass retrieval ranged from 67% to 85%. In grasslands, vegetation indices offer the advantage of superseding the influences of soil background, atmospheric composition, and the viewing and zenith angle effects, while enhancing the vegetation signal, when estimating AGB [41]. The regression model with an input variable of VH using Sentinel-1 SAR data only does not perform very well.…”
Section: The Accuracy and Uncertainty Of The Agb Estimation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is limited to understand the performance of S1 and the fusion of S1 and S2 to retrieve biomass in non-forest regions (Castillo et al, 2017). A recent publication on a grass-covered wetland reported that incorporating S1 and S2 yielded more accurate AGB estimates than did single sensors (Naidoo et al, 2019). In this study, the AGB models were built using field samples in 2015 and then assessed using the samples in 2016 (Figs.…”
Section: Estimates Of Grassland Agb From High Resolution Images (S1 mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the SAR signals are affected by soil background and topography (Chang and Shoshany, 2016). Thus, integration of optical and SAR datasets would reduce the influences of soil background and weather conditions on image data analysis for grasslands (Naidoo et al, 2019). The advantages of integrated SAR and optical data were found to improve AGB estimation in non-grassland ecosystems by overcoming limitations of each sensor (Chang and Shoshany, 2016;Lu, 2006;Lu et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, the canopy height in sample plots of similar grassland palustrine wetland sites (Chrissiesmeer, Mpumalanga Province) was 1.5-2 m, with an estimated biomass ≤850 g/m². 50 The Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) 51,52 is often used to compensate for the influence of vegetation in estimating SMC 24,49 . However, according to Hornacek et al 32 , vegetation and texture have very little impact on the %SMC modelling if grass vegetation is ≤1 kg/m 2 .…”
Section: In-situ Soil Moisture Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%