2021
DOI: 10.1111/oik.08368
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating abundance and phenology from transect count data with GLMs

Abstract: Estimating population abundance is central to population ecology. With increasing concern over declining insect populations, estimating trends in abundance has become even more urgent. At the same time, there is an emerging interest in quantifying phenological patterns, in part because phenological shifts are one of the most conspicuous signs of climate change. Existing techniques to fit activity curves (and thus both abundance and phenology) to repeated transect counts of insects (a common form of data for th… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Central Texas Eurycea salamander surface abundance is known to increase throughout the spring, peak in the summer, and decrease in autumn and winter ( Bowles, Sanders & Hansen, 2006 ; Pierce et al, 2010 ; Bendik, 2017 ). To account for this phenology, we included the quadratic effect of day-of-year (day 2 ) as a predictor within each model ( Kéry & Royle, 2016 ; Edwards & Crone, 2021 ). We included the lower-order term of “day” to adhere to the rules of marginality ( McCullagh & Nelder, 1989 ; Kéry & Royle, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Central Texas Eurycea salamander surface abundance is known to increase throughout the spring, peak in the summer, and decrease in autumn and winter ( Bowles, Sanders & Hansen, 2006 ; Pierce et al, 2010 ; Bendik, 2017 ). To account for this phenology, we included the quadratic effect of day-of-year (day 2 ) as a predictor within each model ( Kéry & Royle, 2016 ; Edwards & Crone, 2021 ). We included the lower-order term of “day” to adhere to the rules of marginality ( McCullagh & Nelder, 1989 ; Kéry & Royle, 2016 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These data included monarch observations across western North America from the late 1800s through 2020, but required careful attention to address its ad-hoc and presence-only nature. We used quantile regression (Cade and Noon 2003) to fit distance from overwintering sites through time as a Gaussian curve (Edwards and Crone 2021) (Figure 2B). We used the 0.9 quantile, which represents the boundary between the 10% of monarchs that were most distant and the remaining 90%, as a measure of breeding season range size that is robust to outliers (we find similar patterns for other quantiles; see Figure S2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3B). In (40) we show how Gaussian curves can be fit with linear models; we combine this approach with the rq() function from the quantreg package, which fits a linear model with quantile regression (41). We used the 0.9 quantile to represent the outer boundary of the monarch range; this captures the expansion of monarchs into their summer breeding range while still being robust to outliers (but the specific quantile chosen did not matter: see below).…”
Section: Breeding Season Rangementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For univoltine species, we fit phenometrics for species-cell-year combinations that had at least five observations, four distinct days of collecting and three distinct collectors. Three days with observations have been demonstrated to produce useful phenoestimates of unimodal species using survey data (Edwards & Crone, 2021). However, multimodal species may have longer durations and more complex seasonal abundances, making their phenometrics harder to estimate (Belitz et al, 2020).…”
Section: Fitting Phenometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%