2010
DOI: 10.2981/09-104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating age of carnivores from the Pantanal region of Brazil

Abstract: Conservation and management of animal populations often require knowledge about the age structure, but this information is usually difficult to discern. We propose a method to estimate the age of carnivores based on dental condition and body size measurements, and we apply the method to populations of brown‐nosed coatis Nasua nasua and crab‐eating foxes Cerdocyon thous in the Brazilian Pantanal. We sexed, weighed and measured 31 coatis and 45 foxes of known‐age, and characterized and quantified their pattern o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
31
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCA clearly showed a high correlation between body mass, head-and-body length, tail length, and neck circumference, with the notable exception of the posterior foot length. The overall reassignment success rate of the discriminant analysis seemed to be fairly good (85.24%) when compared to studies on other carnivores where accuracy of age determination ranged from 31 to 100% (Gerasimov, 1985;Olifiers et al, 2010). In all cases, the main errors were the misclassification of adults in the subadult class or the reverse.…”
Section: Discriminating Age Classes Using Simple Morphological Measurmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The PCA clearly showed a high correlation between body mass, head-and-body length, tail length, and neck circumference, with the notable exception of the posterior foot length. The overall reassignment success rate of the discriminant analysis seemed to be fairly good (85.24%) when compared to studies on other carnivores where accuracy of age determination ranged from 31 to 100% (Gerasimov, 1985;Olifiers et al, 2010). In all cases, the main errors were the misclassification of adults in the subadult class or the reverse.…”
Section: Discriminating Age Classes Using Simple Morphological Measurmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The factor scores of the first PCA axes that explained >80% of the cumulative data variation were then applied in a discriminant analysis (DA) to determine whether the phenotypic traits could be reliably used to assign male leopards to their respective age classes [26]. The discriminant model was built using a randomly selected 70% of the dataset.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of distinguishable wear categories following Olifiers et al (2010) allowed us to limit subjectivity when evaluating tooth attrition, which likely improved the repeatability of our assessments. Moreover, the constant increase of tooth attrition with fox age indicated the relevance of a linear model to predict age of individuals, whereas the strong relation (r 2  0.64) between tooth wear notation and known age indicates that individuals could be reliably aged from tooth wear in our studied population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the times, tooth wear was used in dead (Harris 1978, Smuts et al 1978, Harris et al 1992, Gay and Best 1996, Hewison 1999, Gipson et al 2000, Rosatte and Silver 2007, anesthetized (Stander 1997, Van Horn et al 2003, Olifiers et al 2010, Delahay et al 2011 or captive (Grau et al 1970) animals. To our knowledge, only Lohr et al (2011) used tooth wear to age non-anesthetized wild mammals, in their case, the brushtail possum Trichosurus vulpecula.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%