2012
DOI: 10.1002/hyp.9249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating agricultural deep drainage lag times to groundwater: application to Antelope Valley, California, USA

Abstract: Estimates of groundwater volumes available in semiarid regions that rely on water balance calculations require the determination of both surface to groundwater lag times and volumes from irrigation or rainfall initiated recharge. Subsurface geologic material hydraulic properties (e.g. hydraulic conductivities, water retention functions) necessary for unsaturated flow modelling are rarely available as are the instrumented field tests that might determine such lag times. Here we develop a simple two‐parameter (s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The unit hydraulic gradient assumption is also valid when considering the relatively small changes in GR p associated with the decadal time step used. However, selection of this large time step does have the potential to inflate estimates of the lag times of the draining water's center of mass, since wet periods (with duration of days to weeks) could significantly increase GR p rates and vertical velocities (see Grismer, 2013). Thus, we consider the lag time estimates achieved with this approach as conservative (large), and recommend that it be used as a first-order approximation with a decadal (or longer) time step.…”
Section: Vertical Velocity and Lag Time Of Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The unit hydraulic gradient assumption is also valid when considering the relatively small changes in GR p associated with the decadal time step used. However, selection of this large time step does have the potential to inflate estimates of the lag times of the draining water's center of mass, since wet periods (with duration of days to weeks) could significantly increase GR p rates and vertical velocities (see Grismer, 2013). Thus, we consider the lag time estimates achieved with this approach as conservative (large), and recommend that it be used as a first-order approximation with a decadal (or longer) time step.…”
Section: Vertical Velocity and Lag Time Of Soil Moisturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The saturated hydraulic conductivity, the most important of the various hydraulic parameters (Stephens, 1995), can vary by orders of magnitude depending on geologic heterogeneity. Grismer (2013) states, "determination of GR rates and lag times to groundwater supplies at depth remains an iterative process that includes model and estimate refinement as additional information is developed." In fact, a very small number of regional-scale hydrological modeling studies that include the vadose zone have attempted to match soil pressure heads or water contents during calibration, and constraints from these measurements do not result in uniqueness of parameter values (Brunner et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e.g., Grismer, 2013;Rossman et al, 2014), are key factors affecting temporal variations in recharge. However, most previous studies equate drainage or percolation below the root zone and recharge at the water table and commonly ignore time lags between the two (e.g., Kendy et al, 2003;Lu et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Water balances have been used to estimate deep percolation rates from desert alfalfa hay production (Bali et al 2001;Grismer 2012) and from Sonoma County wine grape production (Grismer and Asato 2012) and also to corroborate field-measured soil profile drainage rates for avocado and citrus orchards on the central California coast (Grismer et al 2000).…”
Section: Soil Water Balance Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%