2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2011.19044.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating animal behavior and residency from movement data

Abstract: We present a process‐based approach to estimate residency and behavior from uncertain and temporally correlated movement data collected with electronic tags. The estimation problem is formulated as a hidden Markov model (HMM) on a spatial grid in continuous time, which allows straightforward implementation of barriers to movement. Using the grid to explicitly resolve space, location estimation can be supplemented by or based entirely on environmental data (e.g. temperature, daylight). The HMM method can theref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
109
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Individual spatial distributions were quantified for the first summer (time of ocean entry-August 6), autumn (August 7-November 6), winter (November 7-February 2), spring (February 3-May 4), and second summer (May 5-recapture date), by calculating the residency distributions (RD) for each season. RDs are the cumulative probability distribution across the spatial domain, thus providing an estimate of the spatial distribution including the uncertainty of the data [28]. Seasons were defined based on the annual solstice and equinoxes by dividing the time series depending on the cross-quarter moments (i.e.…”
Section: Horizontal Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individual spatial distributions were quantified for the first summer (time of ocean entry-August 6), autumn (August 7-November 6), winter (November 7-February 2), spring (February 3-May 4), and second summer (May 5-recapture date), by calculating the residency distributions (RD) for each season. RDs are the cumulative probability distribution across the spatial domain, thus providing an estimate of the spatial distribution including the uncertainty of the data [28]. Seasons were defined based on the annual solstice and equinoxes by dividing the time series depending on the cross-quarter moments (i.e.…”
Section: Horizontal Movementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some behaviours, interpolation may not represent a realistic model of complex fine-scale movement between sampled locations. An alternative approach would have been to estimate location and behavioural state simultaneously within an integrated state-space framework [14,19], incorporating models of individual movement such as random walks, correlated random walks or Lévy walks. While such approaches may offer some advantages, they can be computationally more complex, and their performance may depend on the choice of appropriate movement models and their parameters.…”
Section: At-sea Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, behaviour may be inferred by characterizing patterns of movement based solely on the geometry or complexity of an animal's path using techniques such as tortuosity [8,9], positional entropy [10,11] or first-passage time [12]. In addition, modelling approaches such as Gaussian mixtures have been used to classify animal tracking data into discrete modes of movement [2,13], while state-space models including hidden Markov models (HMMs) [10,[14][15][16][17][18][19] have been used to identify different modes of movement and the dynamics of switching between them.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting estimates were used to investigate the relationship between adult bull trout behavior in the forebay of Kinbasket Reservoir and putative factors influencing their behavior. Behavior was characterized in terms of bull trout residence time and spatial distribution in the forebay, distance to the intakes and two behavioral states based on movement patterns: transiting (fast, directed movement) and exploratory (slow, undirected movement) [24,25]. Specifically, our objectives were to investigate (1) temporal (diel and seasonal) patterns in bull trout behavior; (2) the association between bull trout behavior and physical (that is, turbine operations, reservoir water elevation) and biological (that is, body temperature) factors; and (3) the behavior of fish preceding their entrainment (should entrainment be observed).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%