2015
DOI: 10.1193/010915eqs005m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Annualized Earthquake Losses for the Conterminous United States

Abstract: We make use of the most recent National Seismic Hazard Maps (the years 2008 and 2014 cycles), updated Census data on population, and economic exposure estimates of general building stock to quantify annualized earthquake loss (AEL) for the conterminous United States. The AEL analyses were performed using the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Hazus software, which facilitated a systematic comparison of the influence of the 2014 National Seismic Hazard Maps in terms of annualized loss estimates in different … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The seismic risk estimates provided by the global model do not replace existing national risk assessments, which are likely to have a greater detail and reliability (e.g. United States—Jaiswal et al, 2015, Turkey—Bommer et al, 2002). The global seismic risk model is a dynamic model, which needs to be improved and updated continuously, as more sophisticated methodologies and data become available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The seismic risk estimates provided by the global model do not replace existing national risk assessments, which are likely to have a greater detail and reliability (e.g. United States—Jaiswal et al, 2015, Turkey—Bommer et al, 2002). The global seismic risk model is a dynamic model, which needs to be improved and updated continuously, as more sophisticated methodologies and data become available.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recognition of the importance of risk information, probabilistic seismic risk models at the national or subnational level are still scarce and unfortunately only openly available for a few regions (e.g. Crowley et al, 2009; Jaiswal et al, 2015; Salgado-Gálvez et al, 2013; Silva et al, 2014a). Some of the reasons behind this paucity of risk models include the lack of probabilistic seismic hazard models, insufficient data concerning the built-environment, lack of adequate vulnerability functions, and insufficient local capacity to perform complex hazard and risk analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) incorporates the USGS hazard models directly in their computer programs to assess earthquake risk to the nation and help communities prepare for earthquake shaking (e.g. FEMA 366 and HAZUS software; Jaiswal et al, 2015, 2017; http://www.fema.gov/hazus/). Other examples of end users are the government agencies such as the US Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, and the Department of Interior who use the models to help evaluate earthquake risk for dams and other important facilities as well as geological surveys and other state and local governments who have responsibility for regional and local seismic hazard and risk planning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, attempts to explain the hypothesized "shallow slip deficit," an apparent discrepancy between fault slip in the shallow (0-3 km) and deeper (>~3 km) crust 3,4 , have appealed to both improved data coverage 5,6 and better quantified uncertainty in the constitutive properties of the shallow crust [6][7][8] . Importantly, our lack of knowledge regarding shallow fault behavior impedes our ability to forecast seismic hazard, with significant financial and public safety consequences 9 . For instance, the Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast 10 and U.S. Geological Survey National Seismic Hazard Maps 11 , which inform insurance rates and emergency plans, depend on measurements of fault slip at Earth's surface that do not consider possible subsurface variations 2,12 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%