2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10237-020-01410-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating aortic thoracic aneurysm rupture risk using tension–strain data in physiological pressure range: an in vitro study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current treatment for aortic aneurysms and dissections remains insufficient by relying only on diameters and growth rates to inform treatment decisions (Glimåker et al, 1991;Kurvers et al, 2004;Satriano et al, 2015). However, there are several ongoing studies aimed at improving patient risk stratification for expansion and rupture (He et al, 2021). Investigating the relationship between the vessel biomechanics and composition helps provide a comprehensive understanding of the disease pathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current treatment for aortic aneurysms and dissections remains insufficient by relying only on diameters and growth rates to inform treatment decisions (Glimåker et al, 1991;Kurvers et al, 2004;Satriano et al, 2015). However, there are several ongoing studies aimed at improving patient risk stratification for expansion and rupture (He et al, 2021). Investigating the relationship between the vessel biomechanics and composition helps provide a comprehensive understanding of the disease pathology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current advancements in modeling now provide the opportunity to leverage machine learning, which has emerged as an effective surrogate model for high-fidelity solvers, in order to overcome previous computational hurdles that would otherwise make such modeling intractable for clinically relevant time frames. Such surrogate models have demonstrated the potential for automated measurement of aortic geometry, patient risk stratification, and the prediction of aneurysm growth and rupture [6,[20][21][22][23][24]. Additionally, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) [25][26][27][28] have been a promising advancement in the domain of scientific machine learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current advancements in modelling now provide the opportunity to leverage machine learning, which has emerged as an effective surrogate model for high-fidelity solvers, in order to overcome previous computational hurdles that would otherwise make such modelling intractable for clinically relevant time frames. Such surrogate models have demonstrated the potential for automated measurement of aortic geometry, patient risk stratification, and prediction of aneurysm growth and rupture [6,[21][22][23][24][25]. Additionally, physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) [26][27][28][29] have been a promising advancement in the domain of scientific machine learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%