2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-3425-6_26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Approximation Errors of Elitist Evolutionary Algorithms

Abstract: When evolutionary algorithms (EAs) are unlikely to locate precise global optimal solutions with satisfactory performances, it is important to substitute alternative theoretical routine for the analysis of hitting time/running time. In order to narrow the gap between theories and applications, this paper is dedicated to perform an analysis on approximation error of EAs. First, we proposed a general result on upper bound and lower bound of approximation errors. Then, several case studies are performed to present… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 26 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested by He et al [35,36], we investigated performances of random local search (RLS) for the case that the status transition matrices can be computationally diagonalized, and estimated the expected approximation error for arbitrary iteration budget [37]. However, when the bitwise mutation is employed in the (1+1) evolutionary algorithm ((1+1)EA), the transition matrix is a full upper triangular transition matrix, the t-th power of which is theoretically feasible but computationally unavailable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As suggested by He et al [35,36], we investigated performances of random local search (RLS) for the case that the status transition matrices can be computationally diagonalized, and estimated the expected approximation error for arbitrary iteration budget [37]. However, when the bitwise mutation is employed in the (1+1) evolutionary algorithm ((1+1)EA), the transition matrix is a full upper triangular transition matrix, the t-th power of which is theoretically feasible but computationally unavailable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%