2019
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.13049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating belowground plant abundance with DNA metabarcoding

Abstract: Most work on plant community ecology has been performed above ground, neglecting the processes that occur in the soil. DNA metabarcoding, in which multiple species are computationally identified in bulk samples, can help to overcome the logistical limitations involved in sampling plant communities belowground. However, a major limitation of this methodology is the quantification of species’ abundances based on the percentage of sequences assigned to each taxon. Using root tissues of five dominant species in a … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The belowground plant community was assessed following the DNA metabarcoding protocol described in Matesanz et al . (2019). In brief, DNA was extracted from 0.1 g of homogenised root tissue of each root sample using the DNeasy Plant Minikit (Qiagen).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The belowground plant community was assessed following the DNA metabarcoding protocol described in Matesanz et al . (2019). In brief, DNA was extracted from 0.1 g of homogenised root tissue of each root sample using the DNeasy Plant Minikit (Qiagen).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, recent advances in DNA metagenomics provide a powerful tool to quantify plant species diversity and biomass partition below ground (e.g. Matesanz et al ., 2019) and, consequently, allows the testing of their effects on soil microbe diversity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the correlation between composition of the sample and sequence reads varies from none to strong. It remains to be shown whether biomass may be linked to read abundance as previously shown in copepods (Clarke et al., 2017; Hirai et al., 2015), in nematode communities (Schenk et al., 2019) and in below‐ground plants (Matesanz et al., 2019), while others failed to assess this link such as in zooplankton assemblages (Harvey et al., 2017). Given that metabarcoding relies primarily on barcode amplification, and that pairs of primers have different affinities for the multitude of targeted gene species amplified within a sample, variable amplification level completely biases the putative quantification of the identified species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This confirms the importance of soil heterogeneity at scales that are assumed as the playground for biotic interactions and neutral processes such as dispersal limitation (Legendre et al, 2009) and its critical role structuring the realized assemblages in these shrublands at fine scale. It may also explain the huge functional diversity found in this type of communities, where very different functional strategies, e.g., grasses, prostrate and erect woody dwarf‐shrubs, forbs and geophytes (Chacón‐Labella, de la Cruz, Pescador, et al, 2016) with different root systems (Matesanz et al, 2019; Illuminati, pers. comm. )…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%