2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0959270908000294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating bird abundance: making methods work

Abstract: SummaryIn many bird monitoring surveys, no attempt is made to estimate bird densities or abundance. Instead, counts of one form or another are made, and these are assumed to correlate with bird density. Unless complete counts on sample plots are feasible, this approach can easily lead to false conclusions, because detectability of birds varies by species, habitat, observer and many other factors. Trends in time of counts often reflect trends in detectability, rather than trends in abundance. Conclusions are fu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
214
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 213 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
214
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…To get an estimate of individual density (Buckland et al 2008), we multiplied this by the estimate of mean group size, 2.81 (2.63 -2.99, 95% CI), based on spotmapping in a four-year behavioral study within 3.4 km² study area ).…”
Section: ~ Poissonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To get an estimate of individual density (Buckland et al 2008), we multiplied this by the estimate of mean group size, 2.81 (2.63 -2.99, 95% CI), based on spotmapping in a four-year behavioral study within 3.4 km² study area ).…”
Section: ~ Poissonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…distance from thresholds or targets) or dynamic (i.e. rates of change towards or away from thresholds or targets) manner (Buckland et al, 2008). Furthermore, assessments with respect to previously identified thresholds can combine both static and dynamic variables, such as in 'Alerts' approaches where sets of quantitative population criteria are used to place species on a "red", "amber" or "green" alert (Eaton et al, 2009).…”
Section: Monitoring Goals and Evaluation Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distance-sampling, its extensions into capture-mark-recapture (CMR), spatial modeling designs, and other recent refinements (Marques et al 2007, Buckland et al 2008, Thomas et al 2010 are improving estimations of population size and trend (Barbraud et al 2009, Southwell & Low 2009, and streamlining fieldwork programs ). The use of meta-analysis and surrogate taxa offers potential for rapid estimation of key demographic parameters in poorly studied populations (Brooke et al 2010).…”
Section: Population Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%