2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2012.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating building inventory for rapid seismic vulnerability assessment: Towards an integrated approach based on multi-source imaging

Abstract: We propose an integrated approach to estimating building inventory for seismic vulnerability assessment, which can be applied to different urban environments and be efficiently scaled depending on the desired level of detail. The approach employs a novel multi-source method for evaluating structural vulnerability-related building features based on satellite remote sensing and ground-based omnidirectional imaging. It aims to provide a comparatively cost-and time-efficient way of inventory data capturing over la… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
81
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
81
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to that, e.g., Borfecchia et al (2010), and Geiß et al (2014Geiß et al ( , 2015 combine limited in situ ground truth building inventory data with features from remote sensing and use techniques of statistical inference for a complete labelling of the residual building inventory according to relevant vulnerability levels. Similar methodological principles were exploited by Wieland et al (2012), Pittore and Wieland (2013), and Geiß et al (2016) to assess seismic vulnerability on an aggregated spatial level to allow for covering larger areas.…”
Section: Third Phase: Methodological Elaboration Of Specific Aspects mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In contrast to that, e.g., Borfecchia et al (2010), and Geiß et al (2014Geiß et al ( , 2015 combine limited in situ ground truth building inventory data with features from remote sensing and use techniques of statistical inference for a complete labelling of the residual building inventory according to relevant vulnerability levels. Similar methodological principles were exploited by Wieland et al (2012), Pittore and Wieland (2013), and Geiß et al (2016) to assess seismic vulnerability on an aggregated spatial level to allow for covering larger areas.…”
Section: Third Phase: Methodological Elaboration Of Specific Aspects mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Taubenböck and Strunz (2013) provide a conceptual framework for some of the pertinent questions of earthquake risk reduction using remote sensing. Thus high-resolution satellite imagery together with improved semi-automatic (object-oriented) feature extraction tools offer wide applications (e.g., Wieland et al, 2012). Likewise, local governments often do see a benefit in establishing and maintaining spatial databases which then can be used firsthand.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) The proposed methodology relies on detailed geospatial data which are prone to be outdated, fragmented, and limited in detail. Users have to identify the most comprehensive data set or make use of promising data capturing tools available (e.g., Pittore and Wieland, 2013;Wieland et al, 2012). (d) The road network is considered a fully functional relational network, the potential failure/disruption of accessibility due to debris cover or damages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other complex methods take advantage of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) sources and their typical side-view geometry in order to retrieve heights [10][11][12]. Even better results can be obtained by combining remotely sensed data with a sample of street-level pictures in a stratified sampling approach within a probabilistic framework [13]. The previously mentioned methods may in principle achieve high accuracies, but they suffer from two major problems: expensive input data, and complexity of analysis in less-than-trivial cases.…”
Section: Existing Approaches To Floor Number Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%