2023
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-48960-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating chronological age through learning local and global features of panoramic radiographs in the Korean population

Han-Gyeol Yeom,
Byung-Do Lee,
Wan Lee
et al.

Abstract: This study suggests a hybrid method based on ResNet50 and vision transformer (ViT) in an age estimation model. To this end, panoramic radiographs are used for learning by considering both local features and global information, which is important in estimating age. Transverse and longitudinal panoramic images of 9663 patients were selected (4774 males and 4889 females with a mean age of 39 years and 3 months). To compare ResNet50, ViT, and the hybrid model, the mean absolute error, mean square error, root mean … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…AI has primarily been used for automated age estimation by analyzing tooth development stages [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], tooth and bone parameters [ 48 , 49 , 50 ], bone age measurements [ 51 ], and pulp–tooth ratio [ 52 , 53 ]. We gathered data from the studies included, but due to the varied data samples used to assess AI model performance, a meta-analysis could not be conducted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AI has primarily been used for automated age estimation by analyzing tooth development stages [ 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 ], tooth and bone parameters [ 48 , 49 , 50 ], bone age measurements [ 51 ], and pulp–tooth ratio [ 52 , 53 ]. We gathered data from the studies included, but due to the varied data samples used to assess AI model performance, a meta-analysis could not be conducted.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%