2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2006.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating countermeasure effects for reducing collisions at highway–railway grade crossings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
29
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…From Eqs. (9) and (10) one can see that model allows the variance to exceed the mean. Also, Poisson regression model can be regarded as a limiting model of negative binomial regression model as α approaches 0.…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 95%
“…From Eqs. (9) and (10) one can see that model allows the variance to exceed the mean. Also, Poisson regression model can be regarded as a limiting model of negative binomial regression model as α approaches 0.…”
Section: Amentioning
confidence: 95%
“…They suggested that stop signs should be applied selectively, only at hazardous passive grade crossings, and should not be used indiscriminately at all passive grade crossings. Additionally, in Canada, it was found that the stop-sign countermeasure can improve crossing safety performance by as much as 35% (Saccomanno, Park, & Fu, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, according to the authors' opinions, these findings can ensure recognition of interactions between KPT and particular classes of TCIS. From that point of view, for instance, it is clear that upgrading passively protected level crossings into actively protected ones can provide a significantly higher level of safety [72,80,122,135,136,149].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%