2019
DOI: 10.3390/w11030582
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Daily Dew Point Temperature Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Abstract: In the current study, the ability of three data-driven methods of Gene Expression Programming (GEP), M5 model tree (M5), and Support Vector Regression (SVR) were investigated in order to model and estimate the dew point temperature (DPT) at Tabriz station, Iran. For this purpose, meteorological parameters of daily average temperature (T), relative humidity (RH), actual vapor pressure (Vp), wind speed (W), and sunshine hours (S) were obtained from the meteorological organization of East Azerbaijan province, Ira… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is no straightforward guideline for splitting the training and testing data in machine learning modeling [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. For instance, the study of Choubin [47] used a total of 63% of their data for model development, whereas Qasem et al, [48] utilized 67% of data, Asadi et al, [41], Samadianfard et al, [49,50], and Dodangeh et al, [51] used 70%, and Zounemat-Kermani et al, [52] implemented 80% of total data to develop their models. Thus, to develop the studied models for PE estimation, we divided the data into training (70%) and testing (30%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no straightforward guideline for splitting the training and testing data in machine learning modeling [38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46]. For instance, the study of Choubin [47] used a total of 63% of their data for model development, whereas Qasem et al, [48] utilized 67% of data, Asadi et al, [41], Samadianfard et al, [49,50], and Dodangeh et al, [51] used 70%, and Zounemat-Kermani et al, [52] implemented 80% of total data to develop their models. Thus, to develop the studied models for PE estimation, we divided the data into training (70%) and testing (30%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the application of machine learning for prediction of pollutants and mercury emissions is well established within the scientific community, the potential of novel machine learning models (e.g., ensembles and hybrids) has still not been explored for mercury prediction. In particular, a wide range of novel hybrid machine learning methods has recently been developed to deliver higher accuracy and performance [47,76,77]. For instance, the hybrid model of the ANFIS-PSO-which is an integration of an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and particle swarm optimization (PSO)-has shown promising results [78].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, machine learning methods have been reported to deliver higher performance in terms of accuracy, robustness, and lower computational power in dealing with uncertainties and big data [38][39][40][41]. Several surveys report that ensemble and hybrid models are the future trends in machine learning due to the fact of their optimized algorithms for higher efficiency [42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Hybrid machine learning models are shown to deliver higher performance in air pollution modeling and prediction [49][50][51][52][53][54].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dragomir Although the application of machine learning for prediction of pollutants and mercury emissions is well established within the scientific communities, the potential of the novel machine learning models (e.g., ensembles and hybrids) is still not explored for mercury prediction. In particular, a wide range of novel hybrid machine learning methods has been recently developed to deliver higher accuracy and performance [47,76,77]. For instance, the hybrid model of ANFIS-PSO which is an integration of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) has shown to deliver promising results [78].…”
Section: Previous Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%