2000
DOI: 10.1672/0277-5212(2000)020<0512:edfseu>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Density From Surveys Employing Unequal-Area Belt Transects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For smaller samples, normal confidence intervals underestimate true intervals by no more than 8% (Stehman & Salzer, 2000). In our trend analysis, small strata had few elephants and, therefore, contributed little to trend estimates (see below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For smaller samples, normal confidence intervals underestimate true intervals by no more than 8% (Stehman & Salzer, 2000). In our trend analysis, small strata had few elephants and, therefore, contributed little to trend estimates (see below).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belt line transects are very commonly used in studies on the population biology of plants [17,18] and they result in more precise estimates of population size, even for rare organisms, compared with square meter quadrats [19]. Following the procedures described by Praptosuwiryo et al [5,20], the belt line transects were 20 × 250 m 2 in size with 20 × 25 m 2 subplots.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For sampling with strips in an irregular-shaped area, the study area can typically be divided into M non-overlapping strips perpendicular to a baseline, having fixed width but unequal length. For estimation of population totals the above given expressions apply, but a ratio estimator considering the area of each strip might perform better (Stehman and Salzer, 2000).…”
Section: P Subsamplingmentioning
confidence: 99%