2007
DOI: 10.1603/0022-2585(2007)44[923:edasoa]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Dispersal and Survival of <I>Anopheles gambiae</I> and <I>Anopheles funestus</I> Along the Kenyan Coast by Using Mark–Release–Recapture Methods

Abstract: Mark-release-recapture (MRR) experiments were conducted with emerging Anopheles gambiae s.l. and Anophelesfunestus Giles at Jaribuni and Mtepeni in Kilifi, along the Kenyan Coast. Of 739 and 1246 Anopheles released at Jaribuni and Mtepeni, 24.6 and 4.33% were recaptured, respectively. The daily survival probability was 0.96 for An. funestus and 0.95 for An. gambiae in Jaribuni and 0.83 and 0.95, respectively, in Mtepeni. The maximum flight distance recorded was 661 m. The high survival probability of An. gambi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
52
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…gambiae travelled less than ¼ mile per day 6. Similarly, a recent mark-release-recapture study in Kenya indicated daily flight ranges of 200–400 m,30 corresponding to the mosquito with the maximal flight length of five grids in our model. Therefore, searching efficiency would increase with flight capability to a certain extent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…gambiae travelled less than ¼ mile per day 6. Similarly, a recent mark-release-recapture study in Kenya indicated daily flight ranges of 200–400 m,30 corresponding to the mosquito with the maximal flight length of five grids in our model. Therefore, searching efficiency would increase with flight capability to a certain extent.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…To confirm that the results of the simulations were not only valid for our experimentally derived values, we ran the simulations separately using values for survivorship and male insemination rate estimated from the literature (Gary and Foster 2001; Midega et al 2007; Rodriguez, Aldridge, and W.A.F., unpublished), and at different levels of fecundity. For the literature-based simulations, R was determined numerically to generate population growth that would yield an arbitrary 50-fold population increase in one year when sugar was readily available.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Previous research into adult mortality has examined the probability of daily survival within a range of temperatures from 5°C to 40°C and with a humidity range from 40% to 100% [17,18], the different mortalities of emerging males and females [33], the time to 50% survival at different temperatures [45,46], the proportion surviving after exposure to high temperatures [16], and survival at different combinations of temperature and relative humidity (RH) [29]. However, our study differs from these by allowing mosquitoes to blood-feed and oviposit, mimicking more closely their true fate as adults.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data have been reported on the influence of adult temperature on adult survival [14][15][16][17][18]. Fewer data exist on the influence of juvenile environmental temperature on juvenile survival [19][20][21][22][23], but none exist, to our knowledge, on the influence of environmental temperature during the juvenile stages on adult mortality, although temperature throughout the mosquito's development may have repercussions on its survival [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%