2015
DOI: 10.1111/biom.12422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating DNA Methylation Levels by Joint Modeling of Multiple Methylation Profiles From Microarray Data

Abstract: Summary DNA methylation studies have been revolutionized by the recent development of high throughput array-based platforms. Most of the existing methods analyze microarray methylation data on a probe-by-probe basis, ignoring probe-specific effects and correlations among methylation levels at neighboring genomic locations. These methods can potentially miss functionally relevant findings associated with genomic regions. In this paper, we propose a statistical model that allows us to pool information on the sam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the joint analysis approach has proven more effective in combining multiple different but similar sources of data than meta-analysis approach. The joint analysis methods developed in other fields of omics data analysis have proven useful in increasing the identification power by borrowing information from other similar diseases (Chen X. et al, 2013; Chung et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2016; Lin et al, 2017). In our previous study, we also demonstrated that our joint analysis framework aiming at DE gene detection is more advantageous than single data set analysis and meta-analysis in both simulation studies and real data cases combining different similar disease data sets (Qin and Lu, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the joint analysis approach has proven more effective in combining multiple different but similar sources of data than meta-analysis approach. The joint analysis methods developed in other fields of omics data analysis have proven useful in increasing the identification power by borrowing information from other similar diseases (Chen X. et al, 2013; Chung et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2016; Lin et al, 2017). In our previous study, we also demonstrated that our joint analysis framework aiming at DE gene detection is more advantageous than single data set analysis and meta-analysis in both simulation studies and real data cases combining different similar disease data sets (Qin and Lu, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the incomplete power, this simple approach might lead to difficulties in interpreting the result of whether a gene is commonly shared by all disease or specific to one disease. On the other hand, joint analysis methods developed in other fields of omics data analysis and have been proven a useful method to increase the identification power by borrowing information from other similar diseases [ 2 , 3 , 16 , 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%