2013
DOI: 10.1002/jgra.50347
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating energy spectra of electron precipitation above auroral arcs from ground‐based observations with radar and optics

Abstract: [1] In 2008, coordinated radar-optical auroral observations were organized in Northern Scandinavia using the European Incoherent Scatter Radar (EISCAT) and the Auroral Large Imaging System (ALIS). A bright auroral arc was imaged on 5 March 2008 from four ground-based stations, remaining stable between 18:41 and 18:44 UT and coinciding with increased electron densities. This work presents a unified inversion framework deriving the electron energy spectrum from either optical (N + 2 1NG(0, 1) emission at 4278 Å)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
40
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
5
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using low‐altitude and solar wind observations, we inferred reasonably well the sheared boundary layer thickness (Δ m ), which was found to be around 3000 km (consistent with in situ observations) and which appears to have some dependence on V sw . Our results indicate that these methods could serve as the basis for development of general tools for inferring boundary layer structures [ Simon Wedlund et al , ]. While there can be significant advantages to using this simplified analytic model for data analysis and modeling, it is also important to recognize the model limitations discussed in section 4.4 that may in some circumstances require a more comprehensive numerical treatment [e.g., Echim et al , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using low‐altitude and solar wind observations, we inferred reasonably well the sheared boundary layer thickness (Δ m ), which was found to be around 3000 km (consistent with in situ observations) and which appears to have some dependence on V sw . Our results indicate that these methods could serve as the basis for development of general tools for inferring boundary layer structures [ Simon Wedlund et al , ]. While there can be significant advantages to using this simplified analytic model for data analysis and modeling, it is also important to recognize the model limitations discussed in section 4.4 that may in some circumstances require a more comprehensive numerical treatment [e.g., Echim et al , ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tanaka et al [] studied the feasibility of combining multi‐instrument data, primarily images of the aurora and ISR measurements of electron density, to produce estimates of the spatial and energy distribution of the electron precipitation. Simon Wedlund et al [] applied such methods to study the energy spectra of electron precipitation above an auroral arc, but the spatial and temporal resolutions of the data and models, 2.5 km and between 5 and 20 s respectively, are unsuitable for studying the highly structured and dynamic small‐scale aurora.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The close-spaced optical instruments used in this study yield persistent observations of precipitation process outcomes [33], [34] complementing on-orbit and rocket-borne in situ measurements with a broader spatiotemporal context, along with improved B ⊥ resolution over widely spaced ground-based imagers. Observation of a typical rapidly moving (several km/s) auroral feature implicitly requires a frame rate on the order of 100 Hz for a narrow 9 • FOV and megapixel-class imager.…”
Section: Observational Requirementsmentioning
confidence: 99%