2016
DOI: 10.14358/pers.82.4.271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Forest and Woodland Aboveground Biomass Using Active and Passive Remote Sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Messinger et al (2016) were able to produce above ground carbon estimates of amazon forests with error values as low as 0.05%. These numbers are comparable to other studies that have studied biomass estimation in eastern forests (Wu et al, 2016) and this is not a surprise that the accuracy of these estimates is greater than that of merchantable tree volumes. This measure was coarser than what was performed in this study and does not take in to account a great number of details necessary to evaluate useable board foot volumes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Messinger et al (2016) were able to produce above ground carbon estimates of amazon forests with error values as low as 0.05%. These numbers are comparable to other studies that have studied biomass estimation in eastern forests (Wu et al, 2016) and this is not a surprise that the accuracy of these estimates is greater than that of merchantable tree volumes. This measure was coarser than what was performed in this study and does not take in to account a great number of details necessary to evaluate useable board foot volumes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Given the physical and financial resources involved in surveying, remote sensing is the only answer. While using a suite of other available methods in flat terrains with low biodiversity, products like Landsat-8 seem best suited for broader spatial-scale forest carbon products, while airborne lidar can be used for estimating fine-scale above-ground forest carbon mapping with low uncertainty 21 . Vegetation index-based calibrations of carbon in high biodiversity mountain forests will be subject to large errors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LiDAR has been recognized as a promising technology to characterize vegetation aboveground biomass (AGB) [13,14]. Wu et al [15] concluded that LiDAR-derived height and intensity metrics could map fine-scale AGB with low uncertainty at the plot-level. Numerous lidar-derived candidate metrics, in particular height metrics, exhibit good correlations with forest biomass [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%