2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating forest structural attributes using UAV-LiDAR data in Ginkgo plantations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
104
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
6
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Researchers [40] verified a better performance in estimates for six forest parameters using UAV-lidar than those obtained in [54], which used airborne lidar. The authors attributed this better performance to the flight characteristics, such as lower flight height (60 m) and slower flight speed (4.8 m·s −1 ) than the ALS system, which reflected at an average UAV-lidar point density of approximately 160 pts per meter squared, which exceeds the typical point density of the lidar ALS data (usually <25 pts per meter squared) [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Researchers [40] verified a better performance in estimates for six forest parameters using UAV-lidar than those obtained in [54], which used airborne lidar. The authors attributed this better performance to the flight characteristics, such as lower flight height (60 m) and slower flight speed (4.8 m·s −1 ) than the ALS system, which reflected at an average UAV-lidar point density of approximately 160 pts per meter squared, which exceeds the typical point density of the lidar ALS data (usually <25 pts per meter squared) [55].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…TLS has advantages for accurate forest inventory. Previous research [40] explored the methods of using TLS to obtain point cloud data and estimate the height and diameter of individual trees at breast height (dbh), and found a mean RMSE for dbh of 1.28 cm and a mean RMSE for tree height of 0.95 m. In [39], researchers reported RMSE ranging from 1.06 to 3.21 cm for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and 1.19 to 3.58 cm for Norway spruce (Picea abies) using a small set of trees, performing scans specifically designed for single trees, making field measurements from various heights and testing many different modeling methods. Researchers [37] obtained a mean error of less than 1 cm in the lower parts of the loblolly pines (Pinus taeda), which were planted in rows with regular spacing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the multitude of surveying methodologies by which it is possible to adopt in coastal environments [4], the most important are certainly (i) the direct survey with GNSS receivers, (ii) Terrestrial Laser Scanning (TLS) [5], (iii) aerial survey by planes and drones with Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) [6], and (iv) the use of aerial photogrammetry [7]. However, direct methods are very time-consuming, and this makes them hard to apply to the mapping of large coastal section extents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, a Novatel global navigation satellite system ground base station was used to ensure GPS accuracies. The real-time UAV LiDAR data were transferred to the ground data terminals through a long-range Wi-Fi system connected to the UAV [35]. The parameters of the UAV platform are listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Test Uav Lidar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%