2002
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2002.801212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating frequency correlation functions from propagation measurements on fading radio channels: a critical review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For one measurement (array) location, the rms delay spread is a single number, while the instantaneous rms delay spread takes on 49 different values, and can be characterized by its histogram or (approximate) cumulative distribution function cdf. More detailed discussions about the meaning and interpretation of those quantities can be found in [23] and [24].…”
Section: B Measurement Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For one measurement (array) location, the rms delay spread is a single number, while the instantaneous rms delay spread takes on 49 different values, and can be characterized by its histogram or (approximate) cumulative distribution function cdf. More detailed discussions about the meaning and interpretation of those quantities can be found in [23] and [24].…”
Section: B Measurement Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antenna elements in this array have a theoretical gain of approximately 5 dBi and a pattern that is omnidirectional in azimuth but not in elevation. Roof-mounted antennas of this type have been used extensively in characterizing mobile radio channels, for example, [33,34], and have been shown [33,35] to have an azimuthal antenna pattern that is within ±3 dB of omnidirectional.…”
Section: Measurement Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in [17], the normally applied Fourier transform relationship between APDPs and frequency correlation functions (FCFs) is not always valid, and the relationship between rms delay spreads and coherence bandwidths can be complicated [18]. This makes it necessary to consider both measures in comparing channel characteristics.…”
Section: Frequency Correlationmentioning
confidence: 99%