2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11205-015-1171-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Homelessness in the Netherlands Using a Capture-Recapture Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These factors might account for the improvements in the social exclusion indicators among the participants in the present study. However, despite these positive results, between 2009 and 2012 the estimated size of the homeless population in the Netherlands increased, which was largely due to the financial crisis (Coumans et al 2015 ). It is estimated that in 2015 a total of 31,000 people were homeless in the Netherlands (Statistics Netherlands 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors might account for the improvements in the social exclusion indicators among the participants in the present study. However, despite these positive results, between 2009 and 2012 the estimated size of the homeless population in the Netherlands increased, which was largely due to the financial crisis (Coumans et al 2015 ). It is estimated that in 2015 a total of 31,000 people were homeless in the Netherlands (Statistics Netherlands 2016 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Netherlands (pop. 17.1 million), over the last few years, the homeless population has grown from an estimated 17,800 in 2009 up to 39,300 in 2018 (Dutch Bureau of Statistics), and is defined by living conditions: people who sleep in a homeless shelter, at a family member's or friend's house without the possibility of staying there for a long time, or in the streets (Coumans, Cruyff, Van der Heijden, Wolf, & Schmeets, 2017). Compared to the general population, homeless people suffer more often from addictions, physical and mental health problems and intellectual disability, and the all-cause standardised mortality ratio is nearly twelve times higher for females and nearly eight times for males (Aldridge et al, 2018;Fazel, Geddes, & Kushel, 2014;Van Straaten et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting () for details. However, it is important to note that the parameters that are associated with the log‐linear models are not well interpretable for practitioners (Coumans et al ., ). Otis et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interested readers are referred to Fienberg (1972a,b), Bishop et al (1975) and International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting (1995) for details. However, it is important to note that the parameters that are associated with the log-linear models are not well interpretable for practitioners (Coumans et al, 2017). Otis et al (1978) proposed an alternative model, which is popularly known as M tb , which accounts for the list dependence with respect to behavioural response variation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%