2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2013.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating maternal mortality and causes in South Africa: National and provincial levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the most populous provinces KZN, EC and GT had the highest numbers of deaths. Other studies conducted in South Africa also found that these three provinces presented with the highest numbers of maternal deaths [ 4 , 7 , 22 ]. This could be due to a number of reasons, a combination of better reporting, an actual increase in deaths and poor health care services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the most populous provinces KZN, EC and GT had the highest numbers of deaths. Other studies conducted in South Africa also found that these three provinces presented with the highest numbers of maternal deaths [ 4 , 7 , 22 ]. This could be due to a number of reasons, a combination of better reporting, an actual increase in deaths and poor health care services.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Provincial level estimates indicate that the Free State had the highest MMR of 286/100 000 live births, higher than the national average of 183/100 000 live births during this period while the Western Cape had the lowest MMR (87/100 000 live births) and was the only province that had a steady decline in maternal deaths during this period (see Figures 1 and 2 ). The overall MMR (183/100 000 live births) for the period under review according to data from StatsSA is substantially lower than the 2007 MMR (299/100 000 live births) computed from civil registration and vital statistics systems [ 1 ] and the 2007 South Africa Community Survey MMR (764/100 000 live births) computed by Udjo et al [ 22 ] indicating a significant increase in maternal mortality ratio after 2006. A substantial annual increase in maternal deaths between 2002 and 2006 occurred in South Africa as depicted in Figure 2 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The period of the sharp increase in maternal mortality ratios countries coincides with the period of sharp increases in HIV prevalence in the countries but it would be incorrect to attribute the increase solely to HIV prevalence. For example, Udjo and Lalthapersad-Pillay (2014) estimated that in 2007 only about 11% of the differences in maternal mortality ratio in the provinces in South Africa were explained by differences in HIV prevalence at provincial level. The beta coefficients in Table 5 indicate that during the period 1990 to 2008, the increase in maternal mortality ratio per unit time period was about 2% in Namibia, 9% in Botswana and 12% in Lesotho, South Africa and Swaziland.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in South Africa remains high, and is unlikely to decrease sufficiently to achieve the millennium development goal of a 75% reduction in MMR between 1990 and 2015 . Although estimates of the national MMR vary widely, the causes of maternal deaths, especially those in health facilities, are better understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maternal mortality ratio (MMR) in South Africa remains high, and is unlikely to decrease sufficiently to achieve the millennium development goal of a 75% reduction in MMR between 1990 and 2015 . Although estimates of the national MMR vary widely, the causes of maternal deaths, especially those in health facilities, are better understood. Since 1997, compulsory reporting of maternal deaths has provided data on causes of maternal death in South Africa, published in triennial Saving Mothers reports from the National Committee on Confidential Enquiries into Maternal Deaths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%