1984
DOI: 10.2307/2288346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Missing Observations in Economic Time Series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In writing the program, considerable care was taken to devise a computationally efficient routine for evaluating the likelihood function. Particular attention was paid to the evaluation of PIIO, the matrix used to initialize the Kalman filter, and the algorithm adopted is described in some detail in our original research report (Harvey and Pierse 1982). Maximization of the likelihood function was camed out by one of the Gill-Murray-Pitfield numerical optimization routines in the UK NAG library, E04 JBF.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In writing the program, considerable care was taken to devise a computationally efficient routine for evaluating the likelihood function. Particular attention was paid to the evaluation of PIIO, the matrix used to initialize the Kalman filter, and the algorithm adopted is described in some detail in our original research report (Harvey and Pierse 1982). Maximization of the likelihood function was camed out by one of the Gill-Murray-Pitfield numerical optimization routines in the UK NAG library, E04 JBF.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be adequately handled through a winsorized version of the observation y, to compute h,, so that the effect of extreme aberrant values is reduced. Alternatively, the masking effect can be investigated by treating an extreme outlier yT as a missing observation (for example Harvey and Pierse, 1984) and recomputing the hat matrix HIT]. Specifically, the masking effect of time T on time t -1 is assessed via hjT1lh,, i.e., the ratio of the statistics after and before "deletion" of the Tth observation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods available for generating forecasts for the missing observations include linear interpolation, OLS out-of-sample forecasts, forecasts based on the EÐ M algorithm and Chow and Lin (1976)'s BLUE estimations for the missing observations, among others. The approach adopted in this paper is to follow Harvey and Pierse (1984) who show that the recursive estimations of ARIMA models with the Kalman ® lter algorithm can produce consistent forecasts for the missing observations. First, each survey series with the missing observations omitted was subjected to the usual identi® cation process for the ARIMA models for ® nding an appropriate structure for each series.…”
Section: I D a T A D E Sc R I P T I O N Smentioning
confidence: 99%