2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2020.105709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating mortality for the assessment of a small-scale fishery: Lane snapper (Lutjanus synagris) in Honduras

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each indicator was determined for the data belonging to Lane Snapper ( Lutjanus synagris ) caught with gill nets of 2” and 3” mesh size. The selectivity bias associated for each mesh size was corrected by fitting different distribution curves (a.k.a selectivity curves) to the length-specific CPUE of each mesh size, this was done using a maximum likelihood method (as described in more detail in [ 33 ] Sierra Castillo et al, (2020)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Each indicator was determined for the data belonging to Lane Snapper ( Lutjanus synagris ) caught with gill nets of 2” and 3” mesh size. The selectivity bias associated for each mesh size was corrected by fitting different distribution curves (a.k.a selectivity curves) to the length-specific CPUE of each mesh size, this was done using a maximum likelihood method (as described in more detail in [ 33 ] Sierra Castillo et al, (2020)).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this study, we assumed that the values of L ∞ of 51.6 cm and k of 0.23 estimated for Puerto Rico for Lane Snapper ( Lutjanus synagris ) were the same for our population and that they remained constant through the study [ 36 ] (Acosta & Appeldoorn, 1992). Different natural mortalities estimated for Lane Snapper ( Lutjanus synagris ) by [ 33 ] Sierra Castillo et al, (2020) were used to assess the impact on the optimal length estimation (Appendix A). A range ±10% of the optimal length—as proposed by [ 2 , 10 , 14 ] Babcock et al, (2013), Cope and Punt (2009), and Froese (2004)—was used to determine the percentage of the catch that falls within the optimal length.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations