2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-01307-2_103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Optimal Feature Subsets Using Mutual Information Feature Selector and Rough Sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, rough sets are known for reducing the redundancy by preserving the discrimination power of the dataset. Few works using rough set concepts with information measures include (Zeng et al 2014;Maji and Pal 2009;Foitong et al 2009;Yang et al 2014;Qian and Liang 2008). Rough sets concept used with MI for feature selection is found to improve the cancer classification accuracy (Xu et al 2009).…”
Section: Ranking Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, rough sets are known for reducing the redundancy by preserving the discrimination power of the dataset. Few works using rough set concepts with information measures include (Zeng et al 2014;Maji and Pal 2009;Foitong et al 2009;Yang et al 2014;Qian and Liang 2008). Rough sets concept used with MI for feature selection is found to improve the cancer classification accuracy (Xu et al 2009).…”
Section: Ranking Metricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The induced evaluation function has been extensively applied to fuzzy rough sets based feature selection 37,48 , variable precision rough sets based feature selection 8 , dominance rough sets based feature selection 16 , rough sets and Bayesian networks based feature selection 40 , dynamic mutual information based feature selection 23 , and normalized mutual information based feature selection 7 . However, mutual information of knowledge relies strongly on prior probability of knowledge that is unknown in information systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%