2006
DOI: 10.1080/15140326.2006.12040652
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Overcharges in Antitrust Cases Using a Reduced-Form Approach: Methods and Issues

Abstract: This paper presents several methods and discusses salient issues pertaining to the use of reduced-form models to estimate overcharges in antitrust matters (e.g., price-fixing) where "but-for" prices may be less than actual prices during the anticompetitive period. In particular, two common types of reduced-form estimations are discussed: the "dummyvariable approach" and the "forecasting approach". Under either methodology, an error correction model is then specified as one way to address technical problems oft… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We can observe them indirectly by estimating the fully identi…ed reduced-form system. The reduced form econometric model is As we need to estimate four reduced form coe¢ cients and we have four unknowns, and the structural parameters and are present in both (19) and (21), all coe¢ cients can be retrieved; see, for example, Nieberding (2006) who describes a similar issue surrounding the identi…cation of linear supply and demand functions. Because we are dealing with estimated coe¢ cients with an accompanying standard error, the structural coe¢ cients , d, , and cannot be found analytically and thus have to be retrieved numerically.…”
Section: Data and Estimation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can observe them indirectly by estimating the fully identi…ed reduced-form system. The reduced form econometric model is As we need to estimate four reduced form coe¢ cients and we have four unknowns, and the structural parameters and are present in both (19) and (21), all coe¢ cients can be retrieved; see, for example, Nieberding (2006) who describes a similar issue surrounding the identi…cation of linear supply and demand functions. Because we are dealing with estimated coe¢ cients with an accompanying standard error, the structural coe¢ cients , d, , and cannot be found analytically and thus have to be retrieved numerically.…”
Section: Data and Estimation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability to measure the overcharge accurately depends upon how reliably and precisely the analysis can distinguish the collusive effect on prices from other influences that are unrelated to the anticompetitive conduct (Nieberding 2006). There are two ways of doing this.…”
Section: Empirical Approach: During-and-after Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the influence of supply and demand factors affects equilibrium price differently in these two periods, then the DV approach may not reliably measure overcharges vis-a-vis an approach that accounts for such a change (Nieberding 2006). There are several important assumptions that are implicitly being made when one approach is selected over the other.…”
Section: Empirical Approach: During-and-after Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the use of explanatory variables that may have been affected by the cartel, such as capacity, should be avoided. (For further discussion on the relative merits of both approaches, see Godek, ; Marshall & Marx, ; McCrary & Rubinfeld, ; Nieberding, ; White, Marshall, & Kennedy, )…”
Section: Estimating Cartel Damages Using Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many recent cartel studies make use of dynamic regression models to quantify cartel overcharges (see Bernheim, ; Davis & Garces, ; Nieberding, ; Roeller & Steen, ; White et al, ). It is natural and advantageous to include lagged prices as additional explanatory variables.…”
Section: Estimating Cartel Damages Using Time Seriesmentioning
confidence: 99%