2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.119.252501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Parameter Uncertainty in Binding-Energy Models by the Frequency-Domain Bootstrap

Abstract: We propose using the frequency-domain bootstrap (FDB) to estimate errors of modeling parameters when the modeling error is itself a major source of uncertainty. Unlike the usual bootstrap or the simple χ 2 analysis, the FDB can take into account correlations between errors. It is also very fast compared to the the Gaussian process Bayesian estimate as often implemented for computer model calibration. The method is illustrated with a simple example, the liquid drop model of nuclear binding energies. We find tha… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
46
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, we can use, as a performance criterion, the improvement on rms error on testing datasets outside the training domain [29]. This is a different strategy than testing samples of interior points randomly taken out of the training sample -which has been done in the previous papers [27,28,[30][31][32]. In search of universality, we model the residuals globally on the large domain of even-even nuclei.…”
Section: Objective and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, we can use, as a performance criterion, the improvement on rms error on testing datasets outside the training domain [29]. This is a different strategy than testing samples of interior points randomly taken out of the training sample -which has been done in the previous papers [27,28,[30][31][32]. In search of universality, we model the residuals globally on the large domain of even-even nuclei.…”
Section: Objective and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a powerful strategy is to estimate residuals by developing an emulator for δ(Z, N ) using a training set of known masses. An emulator δ em (Z, N ) can, for instance, be constructed by employing Bayesian approaches, such as Gaussian processes, neural networks, and frequency-domain bootstrap [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. The unknown separation energies can then be estimated from Eq.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the regions where experimental mass data are absent, nuclear models must be deployed to provide the missing information about the topography of the mass surface. In this context, the quality of theoretical mass predictions can be significantly improved when aided by the current experimental information through machine learning techniques [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39]. Recently, we developed the statistical framework of Bayesian Gaussian process techniques to quantify patterns of systematic deviations between theory and experiment by providing statistical corrections to average prediction values, and develop full uncertainty quantification on predictions through credibility intervals [40].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been successfully implemented in statistical models like Canonical Thermodynamical Model(CTM) [10], the Statistical Multifragmentation Model (SMM) [3] and others in order to throw light on the nuclear multifragmentation process. Excellent fits of experimental masses with high level of accuracy for ground state masses at normal density are available [13][14][15]. The process of nuclear multifragmentation however occurs at sub saturation density and at higher excitation energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%