Estimating Preferences for Treatments in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

Ávila, Mónica; Becerra, Virginia; Suárez, José Francisco; Fernández, Pablo; Macías, Víctor; Mariño, Alfonso; Hervás, A.; Herruzo, Ismael; Ortiz, M.; León, Javier Ponce de; Sancho, Gemma; Cunillera, Oriol; Pardo, Yolanda; Cots, Francesc; Ferrer, M.; Alonso, Jordi; Garín, Olatz; Pont, Àngels; Boladeras, A.; Ferrer, F.; Guedea, Ferrán; Martinez, E.; Pera, J.; Ventura, Montse; Aguiló, F; Castells, M.; Villavicencio, H.; Craven-Bratle, Jordi; Paula, Belen de; Guix, B.; Hernández, Helena; Becerra-Muñoz, Víctor Manuel; Ramos, A.; Prada, Pedro J.

doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.09.044

Cited by 16 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 44 publications

(44 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…No additional references were found by hand searching included studies. The methods used for eliciting valuations were direct (8 studies), 35,36,41–50 indirect (16 studies), 36,43,47,49,51–67 or a combination of both (5 studies). 36,43,47,49,62 The most frequently used indirect measurement instruments were the EQ-5D (13 studies), 49,53–56,60–67 the PORPUS (7 studies), 36,43,49,51,52,58,59 followed by the HUI2/3 (3 studies), 47,49,58 the QWB (3 studies), 43,49,57 the 15D (2 studies), 54,…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Of the studies adopting the direct elicitation method, the TTO technique (9 studies) 35,41,42,44–46,48,50,62 was more frequently used than the SG (4 studies). 35,36,47,49 One study used both TTO and SG techniques. 35 There was a reasonably even spread of publications over the period, averaging almost three studies each year.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…35,36,47,49 One study used both TTO and SG techniques. 35 There was a reasonably even spread of publications over the period, averaging almost three studies each year.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Studies were conducted in the United States (9 studies) 41,42,44–47,50,57,67 ; Canada (6 studies) 36,43,49,52,58,59 ; the United Kingdom (4 studies) 55,56,60,65 ; multinational groups (4 studies) 53,61,63,66 ; Spain (2 studies) 35,51 ; Finland (2 studies) 54,64 ; with one study in each of the Netherlands 48 and Japan. 62…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utility Values of Patients and Partners Between 2007 and 2016

Magnus

Isaranuwatchai

Mihalopoulos

et al. 2019

MDM Policy & Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. There is widespread agreement that both the length and quality of life matter when assessing new technologies and/or models of care in the treatment for cancer patients. Quality of life for partners/carers also matters, particularly for prostate cancer. Purpose. This systematic review aims to provide up-to-date utility values along the prostate cancer care continuum (i.e., from prescreening through to palliative care) for use where future trial-based or modelled economic evaluations cannot collect primary data from men and/or partners. Data Sources. A protocol was developed and registered on the international register of systematic reviews—PROSPERO. Databases searched included EBSCO Information Services (CINAHL, EconLit, Global Health, HEED, MEDLINE Complete, PsycINFO), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Science, and Embase. Study Selection. Study selection terms included health-related quality of life, prostate cancer, and partners or carers. Data Extraction. The authors identified articles published between 2007 and 2016 that provided health state utility values, with statistical uncertainty, for men with or at risk of prostate cancer and/or their partner/carers. Data Synthesis and Results. Study quality and generalizability of utilities was evaluated and meta-analysis conducted against prespecified criteria. From 906 original articles, 29 recent primary studies met the inclusion/exclusion criteria. We tabulate all the utility values with uncertainty, along with considerable methodological detail and patient population characteristics. Limitations. Utility values pertaining to carers/partners were limited to one study. Conclusions. Studies varied in design, measurement instruments utilized, quality, and generalizability. There is sufficient qualitative and quantitative detail for the reported utility values to be readily incorporated into economic evaluations. More research is needed with carers/partners and with newly developing prostate cancer-specific quality of life tools.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…35,36,47,49 One study used both TTO and SG techniques. 35 There was a reasonably even spread of publications over the period, averaging almost three studies each year.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utility Values of Patients and Partners Between 2007 and 2016

Magnus

Isaranuwatchai

Mihalopoulos

et al. 2019

MDM Policy & Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…prostate cancer) for which radiotherapy represents a valid alternative to surgery. Once similarly excellent clinical outcomes achievable with both treatment modalities are ascertained, the preferences of prostate cancer patients are in fact strongly impacted by the fear of side-effects ( Avila et al, 2015 ).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Radiation Induced Lymphocyte Apoptosis: An Effective Way of “Tailoring” Radiotherapy to the Right Patients Only?

Cozzarini

2015

EBioMedicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OP, Bestrahlung oder Brachytherapie?

Medizin-Verlag¹

2015

best practice onkologie

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Estimating Preferences for Treatments in Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer

Cited by 16 publications

References 44 publications

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utility Values of Patients and Partners Between 2007 and 2016

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prostate Cancer Utility Values of Patients and Partners Between 2007 and 2016

Radiation Induced Lymphocyte Apoptosis: An Effective Way of “Tailoring” Radiotherapy to the Right Patients Only?

OP, Bestrahlung oder Brachytherapie?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About