2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0887-6177(01)00136-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating premorbid intelligence Comparison of traditional and contemporary methods across the intelligence continuum

Abstract: The present investigation compared the North American Adult Reading Test (NAART), Wide Range Achievement Test-3 (WRAT-3) Reading subtest, Barona, and Oklahoma Premorbid Intelligence Estimate Best (OPIE) premorbid intelligence estimates in 64 chronic pain patients across three intelligence ranges. Results for the entire sample revealed that the NAART, Barona, and OPIE Best equations overestimated Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised Full Scale IQ (WAIS-R FSIQ), while the WRAT-3 underestimated FSIQ. When th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
41
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenotypic correlations reported here between the reading measures and IQ subtests are somewhat lower than those typically reported between IQ scores and reading measures Griffin et al, 2001;LastineSobecks, Jackson, and Paolo, 1998). This may be partly due to the lower reliability of IQ subtests compared to summary IQ scores (Wechsler, 1981).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The phenotypic correlations reported here between the reading measures and IQ subtests are somewhat lower than those typically reported between IQ scores and reading measures Griffin et al, 2001;LastineSobecks, Jackson, and Paolo, 1998). This may be partly due to the lower reliability of IQ subtests compared to summary IQ scores (Wechsler, 1981).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…From the same study, estimates of 66% and 33% were found for WAIS-R Full Scale IQ and Performance IQ, respectively. Similar estimates have been provided from other studies (e.g., Griffin et al, 2001;Lastine-Sobecks, Jackson, and Paolo, 1998). Beardsall (1998) reported the proportion of variance in WAIS-R Verbal IQ accounted for by the CCRT as 61%.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The demographic-based regression method for estimating premorbid ability involves developing a multiple linear regression (MLR) model by employing onlydemographicbased variables (e.g., age, gender, education, ethnicity, and occupation) that are easily obtainable and potentially avoid the effects of current ability levels or neurological injury (Griffin et al, 2002). The approach that combinesthe use of demographic variables and current actual performancealso utilizes MLR to predict scores on an IQ measure.…”
Section: Traditional Methods Of Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is common in clinical practice for neuropsychologists to use a discrepancy between a predicted and an obtained test score to assist in the determination of whether organic impairment or a progressive disease is present. Thus, an accurate estimation of premorbid intelligence is necessary to prevent errors such as under-or overestimation of a patient's level of cognitive decline (Griffin, Mindt, Rankin, Ritchie, & Scott, 2002), and the availability of techniques demonstrating good validity and reliability for predicting premorbid intellectual functioning is a central concern of clinicians. When premorbid ability levels can be reasonably estimated, a diagnosis can be made with confidence, and cognitive rehabilitation programs can be properly designed, monitored, and modified (Reynolds, 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%