2022
DOI: 10.1017/s204579602200018x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating prevalence of child and youth mental disorder and mental health-related service contacts: a comparison of survey data and linked administrative health data

Abstract: Aims Prevalence estimates of child and youth mental disorder and mental health-related service contacts are needed for policy formulation, research, advocacy and resource allocation. Our aim is to compare prevalence estimates of child and youth mental disorder and mental health-related service contacts derived from general population survey data v. linked administrative health data. Methods Provincially representative 2014 Ontario Child Health Study data were linked to administrative hea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A strength of this study was the combined register data gathered and merged from several different administrative registers that presented both health care and other service utilization in the population. Compared to survey data, which may suffer from response bias, register-based data is more reliable in terms of missing information and selection into data [ 50 ]. The data also enabled visits in primary and specialized care to be studied separately, which in turn offered a more comprehensive view on the health care utilization trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A strength of this study was the combined register data gathered and merged from several different administrative registers that presented both health care and other service utilization in the population. Compared to survey data, which may suffer from response bias, register-based data is more reliable in terms of missing information and selection into data [ 50 ]. The data also enabled visits in primary and specialized care to be studied separately, which in turn offered a more comprehensive view on the health care utilization trajectories.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the study population was identified based on the diagnosis. Mental health and behavioral conditions can be underdiagnosed in children to some extent [50][51][52]. Thus, the service utilization of these children could not be studied here.…”
Section: Methodological Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each visit had an associated indicator column for whether a patient had an ED revisit within the next 30 days. While restricting ED visits and revisits to mental health-related diagnoses was considered, we included any ED visits and revisits for the following reasons: 1) ICD-10 codes (used for most responsible diagnosis) underrepresent child/youth psychiatric disorders; 29 2) diagnostic codes for mental health and substance use disorders used in administrative health records are unreliable; 30,31 3) most responsible diagnosis and presenting complaint misses any secondary mental health-related diagnoses that might be a contributing reason for the visit. Instead, we use EHR data from mental health outpatients expecting that they may be at increased risk for visiting an ED for mental health-related concerns compared to children and youth who did not receive outpatient services during the study timeframe.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%