2017
DOI: 10.1080/23737484.2017.1398057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating prevalence of induced abortion and multiple sexual partners using improved randomized response technique for two sensitive attributes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, contrary to what was reported by Jann et al, (2012) where Crosswise Model (CM) produced higher estimate with higher standard error, the proposed method produced higher estimate with lower standard error as against the DM. Hence, the proposed model performs better than the DM in line with earlier works of Jann et al (2012), Ewemooje et al, (2017), Cobo et al, (2016) and Ewemooje et al, (2019b).…”
Section: Application Of the Proposed Modelsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, contrary to what was reported by Jann et al, (2012) where Crosswise Model (CM) produced higher estimate with higher standard error, the proposed method produced higher estimate with lower standard error as against the DM. Hence, the proposed model performs better than the DM in line with earlier works of Jann et al (2012), Ewemooje et al, (2017), Cobo et al, (2016) and Ewemooje et al, (2019b).…”
Section: Application Of the Proposed Modelsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…They found out that RRM elicited more socially undesirable answers than direct questioning. Ewemooje et al, (2017) also used Improved Randomized Response Technique for two sensitive attributes (IRRT2) to show that RRM performs better that Direct Method of questioning (DM) by estimating prevalence of induced abortion and multiple sexual partners. Cobo et al, (2016) used RRM to investigate cannabis use by Spanish University students and then compared the result with DM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Christofides [16] introduced the RR model to estimate the proportions of two dependent sensitive attributes at the same time. Studies on estimation of two dependent sensitive attributes have been reported by Lee et al [17]; Batool and Shabbir [18]; Ewemooje and Amahia [19]; Ewemooje [20]; and Ewemooje et al [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, a lot of work has been done to improve Warner [1] work by modifying and developing new Randomized Response Techniques (RRT). These include; Mangat and Singh [2], Kim and Warde [3], Adebola et al [4], Ewemooje and Amahia [5,6], Singh and Gorey [7], Ewemooje [8], Ewemooje et al [9,10] and so on. Adebola et al [11] proposed a Hybrid Tripartite Randomized Response Technique (HTRRT) to take care of respondents who may not choose either "yes" or "no" which led to their third option called "undecided" response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%