1988
DOI: 10.2307/4910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Primate Densities from Transects in a West African Rain Forest: A Comparison of Techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
227
2
4

Year Published

1993
1993
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 230 publications
(233 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
227
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…We determined densities for 100-m increments, i.e., 0-100 m, 101-200 m, etc., from the forest edge into the interior. We estimated sighting widths for each 100-m increment via the perpendicular distance (m) from the individual to the transect and the histogram inspection technique, with a 50% criterion for falloff distance (Whitesides et al, 1988). We conducted botanical surveys along both sides of each transect to a depth of 1 m, for a total area sampled of 1 ha.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We determined densities for 100-m increments, i.e., 0-100 m, 101-200 m, etc., from the forest edge into the interior. We estimated sighting widths for each 100-m increment via the perpendicular distance (m) from the individual to the transect and the histogram inspection technique, with a 50% criterion for falloff distance (Whitesides et al, 1988). We conducted botanical surveys along both sides of each transect to a depth of 1 m, for a total area sampled of 1 ha.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each group of primates encountered, the researcher recorded the species, group size, distance, compass bearing of the group, time, and habitat type. Distances were estimated to the group centre (Whitesides et al 1988) by eye to the nearest metre. Researchers occasionally left the trail to confirm group size, but all groups were initially detected from the transect line.…”
Section: Primate Survey Methods and Density Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a convenient alternative means of examining this issue is to analyze seasonal variation in home range size. Population density is the inverse of per capita home range size and is modified by the degree of overlap of home range between neighboring groups (Whitesides et al 1988). Thus, an index of population density can be obtained during the season when the animal range most extensively, which is likely the season that limits animal abundance.…”
Section: Studies On Resource Limitation At the Behavioral Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since they are diurnal and standardized census methods are established (National Research Council 1981;Whitesides et al 1988), comparable data on abundance are available for many species, often from a number of populations. Furthermore, since most primates are diurnal and have large body sizes, detailed behavioral observation is feasible and there have been many studies of their feeding ecology (Clutton-Brock 1977;Hohmann et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%