1975
DOI: 10.2307/3543502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Relative Densities of Breeding Birds by the Line Transect Method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
83
0
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
83
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Red deer relative abundance data was obtained by spotlighting at night. Counts were transformed into indices of abundance per km [35] and to deer per ha [17] (mean transect length 14.84 ± 13.90 km). At least one experienced observer (Joaquin Vicente and Christian Gortazar) participated in each transect.…”
Section: Estimation Of Red Deer and Wild Boar Relative Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Red deer relative abundance data was obtained by spotlighting at night. Counts were transformed into indices of abundance per km [35] and to deer per ha [17] (mean transect length 14.84 ± 13.90 km). At least one experienced observer (Joaquin Vicente and Christian Gortazar) participated in each transect.…”
Section: Estimation Of Red Deer and Wild Boar Relative Abundancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sin embargo, esto no tendría por qué ser así si se pudiese contar con una aproximación lógica y matemática que vinculase la detectabilidad real de cada especie con las proporciones de aves observadas dentro y fuera de esa banda única circular de censo de 25 m de radio. De hecho, hace ya tiempo que existen trabajos demostrando que esta aproximación es posible utilizando el método del transecto lineal (Järvinen y Väisänen, 1975).…”
Section: Cálculo De La Detectabilidadunclassified
“…The index is based on the linear model of Jarvinen & Vaisanen (1975) = Subalpine and scrub stations The relative density per station was computed from the total numbers of birds observed at that station and the effective radius at that group of stations.…”
Section: General Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dawson (1981) argued that all of these techniques have problems and none provides accurate estimates of absolute abundance. He concluded that the most efficient type of survey, given the possible sources of error, was a line transect technique with a near/far ratio (Jarvinen & Vaisanen 1975). Verner (1981) states that: "bird counting is a distressingly imprecise science", and points to the high variance between counts as an indication of the large number of biasing factors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation