2014
DOI: 10.1109/tr.2014.2299151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating Remaining Useful Life With Three-Source Variability in Degradation Modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
139
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
139
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Si et al [185] attempted to characterize the effect of three sources of variation (temporal, unit-tounit, and measurement) contributing to the uncertainty of the estimated RUL via a general degradation model. The PDF of the underlying degradation state and random effect parameters were estimated based on KF.…”
Section: Kalman Filter-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si et al [185] attempted to characterize the effect of three sources of variation (temporal, unit-tounit, and measurement) contributing to the uncertainty of the estimated RUL via a general degradation model. The PDF of the underlying degradation state and random effect parameters were estimated based on KF.…”
Section: Kalman Filter-based Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the -step, the parameter estimate is updated through maximizing the expected function found in the -step, and then the updated parameter estimate is utilized to determine the distribution of the latent variables in the E-step of next iteration. By this way, EM algorithm iterates between the two steps until convergence [14,18].…”
Section: Unknown Parameter Fusion Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Si et al in [6] reviewed the statistical data driven approaches for RUL estimation. The existing methods were classified into two categories: direct condition monitoring data based approaches and indirect condition monitoring data based approaches, which can be further divided into stochastic filtering based methods [7][8][9][10], covariance based hazard model methods [11,12], Wiener-process-based methods [13,14], Gamma process based methods [15,16], and Markovian-based methods [17] and others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Integrating the influence of uncertainty measurement and individual differences into reliability analysis to achieve more accurate reliability analysis of stochastic degradation systems is worth studying. In recent years, many scholars have been devoted to this [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Zhang [4] models the degradation state evolution of a system through a diffusion process with piecewise but time-dependent drift coefficient functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%