2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Estimating residents' WTP for ecosystem services improvement in a payments for ecosystem services (PES) program: A choice experiment approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In subsistence economies when currency is scarce, it is common to employ working days as a kind of payment in environmental value studies (Cunha-E-Sá et al 2023;Meginnis et al 2020). The use of payment through tax systems and mandatory payment otherwise is often less accepted in these societies as compared to developed economies, which can apply these payment vehicles with considerable credibility due to the stability and efficiency of tax systems (Cunha-E-Sá et al 2023; Ureta et al 2022). Some recent studies also explore the role of carbon taxes as a payment vehicle (Liu et al 2021;Qin et al 2020).…”
Section: Payment Vehicle For Choice Experiments Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In subsistence economies when currency is scarce, it is common to employ working days as a kind of payment in environmental value studies (Cunha-E-Sá et al 2023;Meginnis et al 2020). The use of payment through tax systems and mandatory payment otherwise is often less accepted in these societies as compared to developed economies, which can apply these payment vehicles with considerable credibility due to the stability and efficiency of tax systems (Cunha-E-Sá et al 2023; Ureta et al 2022). Some recent studies also explore the role of carbon taxes as a payment vehicle (Liu et al 2021;Qin et al 2020).…”
Section: Payment Vehicle For Choice Experiments Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Customers' willingness to pay (WTP) is critical to setting price as it sets the maximum amount which customers are willing to pay for a good or a service. Ureta et al (2022) studied more than 1500 residents of South Carolina, to assess their willingness to pay for ecosystem services improvements, and concluded that the mean WTP is in the range of $0.3 and $6.39 and established a model for payment for ecosystem services. Schuermann & Woo (2022) assessed the WTP for reusable food containers in South Korean market and concluded that food companies are willing to pay up to $2.18 per container.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the use of LCP diet for feeding pigs will allow for ecosystem services (ESs) generation that are valued as the benefits produced by ecosystems; in other words, the connection between ecosystems and human welfare [ 11 ]. As a way of managing these ESs and achieving socially, economically, and ecologically desirable outcomes, payment for ESs is a potential approach that ensures financial support to protect and conserve the quality and sustainability of ESs [ [12] , [13] , [14] ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%